What's yours is ours: Waiving intellectual property protections for COVID-19 vaccines

Nancy S. Jecker, Caesar A. Atuire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper gives an ethical argument for temporarily waiving intellectual property (IP) protections for COVID-19 vaccines. It examines two proposals under discussion at the World Trade Organization (WTO): the India/South Africa proposal and the WTO Director General proposal. Section I explains the background leading up to the WTO debate. Section II rebuts ethical arguments for retaining current IP protections, which appeal to benefiting society by spurring innovation and protecting rightful ownership. It sets forth positive ethical arguments for a temporary waiver that appeal to standing in solidarity and holding companies accountable. After examining built-in exceptions to existing agreements and finding them inadequate, the paper replies to objections to a temporary waiver and concludes, in section III, that the ethical argument for temporarily waiving IP protection for COVID-19 vaccines is strong.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)595-598
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume47
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2021

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • allocation of health care resources
  • ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What's yours is ours: Waiving intellectual property protections for COVID-19 vaccines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this