Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What Research Questions Should the Next Generation of Birth Cohort Studies Address? An International Delphi Study of Experts

  • Ruth Harriet Brown
  • , Manuel Eisner
  • , Sara Valdebenito
  • , Susan Walker
  • , Mark Tomlinson
  • , Claire Hughes
  • , Catherine L. Ward
  • , Joseph Osafo
  • , Siham Sikander
  • , Pasco Fearon
  • , Michael P. Dunne
  • , Bernadette Madrid
  • , Adriana Baban
  • , Vo Van Thang
  • , Asvini D. Fernando
  • , Aja L. Murray
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Institute of Criminology
  • The University of the West Indies
  • Stellenbosch University
  • Queen’s University Belfast
  • University of Cambridge
  • University of Cape Town
  • Health Services Academy
  • University College London
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • University of the Philippines Manila
  • Babes-Bolyai University
  • Hue University
  • University of Kelaniya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Birth cohort studies (BCS) have generated a wealth of invaluable basic scientific and policy-relevant information on a wide range of issues in child health and development. This study sought to explore what research questions are currently a priority for the next generation of BCS using a 3-round Delphi survey of interdisciplinary experts. Methods: Twenty-four (Round I, N = 17; Round II, N = 21; Round III, N = 18) experts across a wide range of fields (eg, psychology, public health, and maternal/child health) agreed to participate. In Round I, the expert panel was invited to freely respond to the question, “what are the key scientific questions future birth cohort studies should address?” Content analysis of answers was used to identify 47 questions for rating on perceived importance by the panel in Round II and consensus-achieving questions were identified. Questions that did not reach consensus in Round II were posed again for expert re-rating in Round III. Results: Twenty six of 47 questions reached consensus in Round II, with an additional 6 reaching consensus in Round III. Consensus-achieving questions rated highly on importance spanned a number of topics, including environmental effects on child development, intergenerational transmission of disadvantage, and designing BCS to inform intervention strategies. Conclusion: Investigating the effects of family/environmental factors and social disadvantage on a child's development should be prioritized in designing future BCS. The panel also recommended that future BCS are designed to inform intervention strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-52
Number of pages10
JournalAcademic Pediatrics
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Delphi method
  • birth cohort studies
  • consensus
  • research priorities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Research Questions Should the Next Generation of Birth Cohort Studies Address? An International Delphi Study of Experts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this