What Exactly is Voting to Consensual Deliberation?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There have been two parallel views regarding the role of voting in deliberation. The first is that deliberation before the fabrication of balloting was completely devoid of voting. The second is that voting is not just part of deliberation, but is standard to deliberation. I argue in this article that neither of these views is correct. Implicit voting has always existed across time and space but only as a last resort in the event of a failure of natural unanimity. What is relatively modern is the establishment of what I call explicit voting; namely, balloting, outside deliberation and often without deliberation. I also distinguish between natural and artificial unanimities, and clarify that artificial unanimities are products of implicit voting. I demonstrate these clarifications with some examples of deliberation. I deploy these clarifications to rid a certain debate of confusion regarding the precise role of voting in consensual deliberation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-79
Number of pages27
JournalPhilosophical Papers
Volume50
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Exactly is Voting to Consensual Deliberation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this