Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Vulnerable newborn types: analysis of subnational, population-based birth cohorts for 541 285 live births in 23 countries, 2000–2021

  • the Subnational Vulnerable Newborn Prevalence Collaborative Group and Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Core Group
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • Harvard Medical School
  • World Health Organization
  • Argentine Society of Paediatrics
  • IntraHealth International
  • Projahnmo Research Foundation
  • JiVitA Maternal and Child Health Research Project
  • Child Health Research Foundation
  • Uppsala University
  • Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Federal University of Pelotas
  • Ghent University
  • International Food Policy Research Institute
  • Universite de Namur
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center
  • Guangzhou Medical College
  • Addis Ababa University
  • St. Paul‘s Hospital Millennium Medical College
  • Addis Continental Institute of Public Health
  • Kintampo Health Research Centre
  • University of California at Davis
  • Columbia University Medical Center
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
  • University of Ghana
  • Aravind Eye Hospital
  • Milken Institute School of Public Health
  • Society for Applied Studies Kolkata
  • Qatar University
  • Public Health Foundation of India
  • Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital
  • Kamuzu University of Health Sciences
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department
  • Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project – Sarlahi (NNIPS)
  • The Aga Khan University
  • Department of Infectious Diseases
  • Charles Darwin University
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • University of Rwanda
  • South African Medical Research Council
  • Columbia University
  • University of South Africa
  • IRCCS Ospedale Infantile Burlo Garofolo - Trieste
  • University Obstetrics Unit
  • University of Colombo
  • George Mason University
  • National Institute for Medical Research Tanzania
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Ifakara Health Institute
  • Ministry of Health Zanzibar
  • Ubon Ratchathani University
  • Mahidol University
  • Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration
  • Makerere University School of Public Health
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Boston University
  • Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine
  • Ariadne Labs
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • University of Zambia
  • North West University
  • United Nations Children's Fund
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia
  • Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine prevalence of novel newborn types among 541 285 live births in 23 countries from 2000 to 2021. Design: Descriptive multi-country secondary data analysis. Setting: Subnational, population-based birth cohort studies (n = 45) in 23 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) spanning 2000–2021. Population: Liveborn infants. Methods: Subnational, population-based studies with high-quality birth outcome data from LMICs were invited to join the Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Collaboration. We defined distinct newborn types using gestational age (preterm [PT], term [T]), birthweight for gestational age using INTERGROWTH-21st standards (small for gestational age [SGA], appropriate for gestational age [AGA] or large for gestational age [LGA]), and birthweight (low birthweight, LBW [<2500 g], nonLBW) as ten types (using all three outcomes), six types (by excluding the birthweight categorisation), and four types (by collapsing the AGA and LGA categories). We defined small types as those with at least one classification of LBW, PT or SGA. We presented study characteristics, participant characteristics, data missingness, and prevalence of newborn types by region and study. Results: Among 541 285 live births, 476 939 (88.1%) had non-missing and plausible values for gestational age, birthweight and sex required to construct the newborn types. The median prevalences of ten types across studies were T+AGA+nonLBW (58.0%), T+LGA+nonLBW (3.3%), T+AGA+LBW (0.5%), T+SGA+nonLBW (14.2%), T+SGA+LBW (7.1%), PT+LGA+nonLBW (1.6%), PT+LGA+LBW (0.2%), PT+AGA+nonLBW (3.7%), PT+AGA+LBW (3.6%) and PT+SGA+LBW (1.0%). The median prevalence of small types (six types, 37.6%) varied across studies and within regions and was higher in Southern Asia (52.4%) than in Sub-Saharan Africa (34.9%). Conclusions: Further investigation is needed to describe the mortality risks associated with newborn types and understand the implications of this framework for local targeting of interventions to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes in LMICs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S20-S36
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume132
Issue numberS8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Keywords

  • low birthweight
  • newborn
  • preterm birth
  • small for gestational age

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vulnerable newborn types: analysis of subnational, population-based birth cohorts for 541 285 live births in 23 countries, 2000–2021'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this