TY - JOUR
T1 - Vibrio cholerae-specific antibodies in plasma and saliva in cholera patients during a severe outbreak in Zambia
T2 - an antibody profiling approach
AU - Luchen, Charlie C.
AU - Ngo’mbe, Harriet
AU - Liswaniso, Fraser
AU - Bosomprah, Samuel
AU - Zhiteneva, Julia A.
AU - Harris, Jason
AU - Charles, Richelle C.
AU - Ryan, Edward T.
AU - Sack, David
AU - Bernshtein, Biana
AU - Chisenga, Caroline C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Luchen, Ngo’mbe, Liswaniso, Bosomprah, Zhiteneva, Harris, Charles, Ryan, Sack, Bernshtein and Chisenga.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Cholera is a public health threat in resource-limited settings and is responsible for causing over 3 million cases globally. Mucosal immune responses play an important role in protecting against Vibrio cholerae infection, a non-invasive mucosal pathogen, yet traditional plasma-based assays are invasive and logistically challenging, particularly during outbreaks in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Saliva offers a unique window into mucosal immunity and may serve as a non-invasive alternative for seroprevalence and vaccine immunogenicity studies. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional antibody profiling study to analyse cholera-specific antibodies in saliva and plasma samples from 74 participants upon presenting to the cholera treatment centres. These were collected from four treatment centres in Lusaka during Zambia’s most severe cholera outbreak in 2024 caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 Ogawa. Levels of total IgG, IgG1-3, IgM, secretory IgA, and IgA1–2 isotypes were used to compare the biomarker profile between the two sample types. Results: Saliva and plasma antibody profiles were comparable, with elevated IgA1 and IgA2 responses to cholera toxin-B (CtxB), sialidase, HlyA, and TcpA in saliva. Broader systemic responses were seen in plasma, including high CtxB-specific IgM, IgA1, and total IgG levels. Notably, biomarkers such as HlyA, Ogawa O-specific polysaccharide (OSP), and sialidase exhibited significant positive correlations between plasma and saliva. Elevated biomarker levels of HlyA, Ogawa O-specific polysaccharide (OSP), and sialidase in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) suggested immunological differences that warrant further exploration. Conclusion: We demonstrate that saliva is a viable, non-invasive alternative for cholera antibody-based profiling, offering practical advantages in resource-constrained settings. Given its strong correlation with systemic antibody profiles, saliva may be a practical sample for sero-surveillance in resource-limited settings. Future studies should investigate the duration of these salivary responses to further substantiate their use in estimating disease burden and immunity.
AB - Background: Cholera is a public health threat in resource-limited settings and is responsible for causing over 3 million cases globally. Mucosal immune responses play an important role in protecting against Vibrio cholerae infection, a non-invasive mucosal pathogen, yet traditional plasma-based assays are invasive and logistically challenging, particularly during outbreaks in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Saliva offers a unique window into mucosal immunity and may serve as a non-invasive alternative for seroprevalence and vaccine immunogenicity studies. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional antibody profiling study to analyse cholera-specific antibodies in saliva and plasma samples from 74 participants upon presenting to the cholera treatment centres. These were collected from four treatment centres in Lusaka during Zambia’s most severe cholera outbreak in 2024 caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 Ogawa. Levels of total IgG, IgG1-3, IgM, secretory IgA, and IgA1–2 isotypes were used to compare the biomarker profile between the two sample types. Results: Saliva and plasma antibody profiles were comparable, with elevated IgA1 and IgA2 responses to cholera toxin-B (CtxB), sialidase, HlyA, and TcpA in saliva. Broader systemic responses were seen in plasma, including high CtxB-specific IgM, IgA1, and total IgG levels. Notably, biomarkers such as HlyA, Ogawa O-specific polysaccharide (OSP), and sialidase exhibited significant positive correlations between plasma and saliva. Elevated biomarker levels of HlyA, Ogawa O-specific polysaccharide (OSP), and sialidase in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) suggested immunological differences that warrant further exploration. Conclusion: We demonstrate that saliva is a viable, non-invasive alternative for cholera antibody-based profiling, offering practical advantages in resource-constrained settings. Given its strong correlation with systemic antibody profiles, saliva may be a practical sample for sero-surveillance in resource-limited settings. Future studies should investigate the duration of these salivary responses to further substantiate their use in estimating disease burden and immunity.
KW - antibody
KW - cholera
KW - immunology
KW - plasma
KW - saliva
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014497503
U2 - 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1641319
DO - 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1641319
M3 - Article
C2 - 40895561
AN - SCOPUS:105014497503
SN - 1664-3224
VL - 16
JO - Frontiers in Immunology
JF - Frontiers in Immunology
M1 - 1641319
ER -