TY - JOUR
T1 - Using Amanhi-Act Cohorts For External Validation Of Iowa New-Born Metabolic Profiles Based Models For Postnatal Gestational Age Estimation
AU - Sazawal, Sunil
AU - Ryckman, Kelli K.
AU - Mittal, Harshita
AU - Khanam, Rasheda
AU - Nisar, Imran
AU - Jasper, Elizabeth
AU - Jasper, Elizabeth
AU - Mehmood, Usma
AU - Das, Sayan
AU - Bedell, Bruce
AU - Chowdhury, Nabidul Haque
AU - Barkat, Amina
AU - Dutta, Arup
AU - Deb, Saikat
AU - Ahmed, Salahuddin
AU - Khalid, Farah
AU - Raqib, Rubhana
AU - Ilyas, Muhammad
AU - Nizar, Ambreen
AU - Ali, Said Mohammed
AU - Manu, Alexander
AU - Yoshida, Sachiyo
AU - Baqui, Abdullah H.
AU - Jehan, Fyezah
AU - Dhingra, Usha
AU - Bahl, Rajiv
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s) JoGH 2021 ISoGH
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background Globally, 15 million infants are born preterm and another 23.2 million infants are born small for gestational age (SGA). Determining burden of preterm and SGA births, is essential for effective planning, modification of health policies and targeting interventions for reducing these outcomes for which accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is crucial. Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements, last menstrual period and post-natal neonatal examinations have proven to be not feasible or inaccurate. Proposed algorithms for GA estimation in western populations, based on routine new-born screening, though promising, lack validation in developing country settings. We evaluated the hypothesis that models developed in USA, also predicted GA in cohorts of South Asia (575) and Sub-Saharan Africa (736) with same precision. Methods Dried heel prick blood spots collected 24-72 hours after birth from 1311 new-borns, were analysed for standard metabolic screen. Regression algorithm based, GA estimates were computed from metabolic data and compared to first trimester ultrasound validated, GA estimates (gold standard). Results Overall Algorithm (metabolites + birthweight) estimated GA to within an average deviation of 1.5 weeks. The estimated GA was within the gold standard estimate by 1 and 2 weeks for 70.5% and 90.1% new-borns respectively. Inclusion of birthweight in the metabolites model improved discriminatory ability of this method, and showed promise in identifying preterm births. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis estimated an area under curve of 0.86 (conservative bootstrap 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83 to 0.89); P < 0.001) and Youden Index of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.51 to 0.64) with a corresponding sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 77.6%. Conclusion Metabolic gestational age dating offers a novel means for accurate population-level gestational age estimates in LMIC settings and help preterm birth surveillance initiatives.
AB - Background Globally, 15 million infants are born preterm and another 23.2 million infants are born small for gestational age (SGA). Determining burden of preterm and SGA births, is essential for effective planning, modification of health policies and targeting interventions for reducing these outcomes for which accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is crucial. Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements, last menstrual period and post-natal neonatal examinations have proven to be not feasible or inaccurate. Proposed algorithms for GA estimation in western populations, based on routine new-born screening, though promising, lack validation in developing country settings. We evaluated the hypothesis that models developed in USA, also predicted GA in cohorts of South Asia (575) and Sub-Saharan Africa (736) with same precision. Methods Dried heel prick blood spots collected 24-72 hours after birth from 1311 new-borns, were analysed for standard metabolic screen. Regression algorithm based, GA estimates were computed from metabolic data and compared to first trimester ultrasound validated, GA estimates (gold standard). Results Overall Algorithm (metabolites + birthweight) estimated GA to within an average deviation of 1.5 weeks. The estimated GA was within the gold standard estimate by 1 and 2 weeks for 70.5% and 90.1% new-borns respectively. Inclusion of birthweight in the metabolites model improved discriminatory ability of this method, and showed promise in identifying preterm births. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis estimated an area under curve of 0.86 (conservative bootstrap 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83 to 0.89); P < 0.001) and Youden Index of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.51 to 0.64) with a corresponding sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 77.6%. Conclusion Metabolic gestational age dating offers a novel means for accurate population-level gestational age estimates in LMIC settings and help preterm birth surveillance initiatives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111774845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7189/JOGH.11.04044
DO - 10.7189/JOGH.11.04044
M3 - Article
C2 - 34326994
AN - SCOPUS:85111774845
SN - 2047-2978
VL - 11
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Journal of Global Health
JF - Journal of Global Health
ER -