Abstract
A retained drainage tube after surgery is rare and patients may be asymptomatic if it occurs. The presence of a retained drainage tube may be first recognized on imaging and this requires a high index of suspicion by radiologists. In this case report, we described an incidental finding of an asymptomatic retained fractured drainage tube in the pelvis of a 32-year-old female on ultrasonography for renal evaluation. This highlighted the need for radiologists to have a high index of suspicion when performing ultrasonography on postoperative patients and surgeons should be meticulous when removing drainage tubes postsurgery. The possibility of a foreign body should be considered when unfamiliar findings are encountered on imaging. Surgeons should inspect drainage tubes after removal to ensure the full length of the tube is removed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3709-3712 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Radiology Case Reports |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2022 |
Keywords
- Computed tomography scan
- Laparotomy
- Pelvis
- Retained drainage tube
- Ultrasonography
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Unintentionally retained pelvic drainage tube found on Imaging; A case report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver