Unintentionally retained pelvic drainage tube found on Imaging; A case report

Klenam Dzefi-Tettey, Emmanuel Kobina Mesi Edzie, Edmund Kwadwo Kwakye Brakohiapa, Juliana Labi, Eunice Sena Aku Nyamuame, Nana Yaa Fredua Agyeman, Jerry Coleman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A retained drainage tube after surgery is rare and patients may be asymptomatic if it occurs. The presence of a retained drainage tube may be first recognized on imaging and this requires a high index of suspicion by radiologists. In this case report, we described an incidental finding of an asymptomatic retained fractured drainage tube in the pelvis of a 32-year-old female on ultrasonography for renal evaluation. This highlighted the need for radiologists to have a high index of suspicion when performing ultrasonography on postoperative patients and surgeons should be meticulous when removing drainage tubes postsurgery. The possibility of a foreign body should be considered when unfamiliar findings are encountered on imaging. Surgeons should inspect drainage tubes after removal to ensure the full length of the tube is removed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3709-3712
Number of pages4
JournalRadiology Case Reports
Volume17
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • Computed tomography scan
  • Laparotomy
  • Pelvis
  • Retained drainage tube
  • Ultrasonography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unintentionally retained pelvic drainage tube found on Imaging; A case report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this