The geopolitical economy of heterarchical solidarity in Afro-Asian relations a meta-institutional construct

Nene Lomotey Kuditchar

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Studies cast in the heuristic frame of hierarchy often impute imperialist and non-progressive motives in the transactions of Asian states in Africa given the power asymmetry between the two continents. To the extent that the analytical logic and conclusions derived from studies of this nature are valid, they are informed by the thinking that African actors cannot decipher and counter imperialist designs and as such are willing victims of imperialism, cannot encode and actively pursue strategic interests, do not value the status of being sovereign, are not rational, and as former imperial subjects of European, suffer from historic amnesia. This chapter avoids the analytical drawbacks of the hierarchy heuristic with the aid of the concept of heterarchical geopolitical economy and meta-institutions. It demonstrates that African actors have leveraged agency-enhancing dividends from interactions with Asia to correct disruptive legacies of Western imperialism.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Geopolitics
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages729-751
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9783031472275
ISBN (Print)9783031472268
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2024

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Geopolitical economy
  • Heterarchy
  • Meta-institution
  • Solidarity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The geopolitical economy of heterarchical solidarity in Afro-Asian relations a meta-institutional construct'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this