Abstract
The basic argument is that the consensus debate has not been very meaningful until now because consensus has not been closely studied as a concept, and deliberation has not been studied precisely in terms of the propensity to reach common agreement. In particular, deliberation - as well as issues for deliberation - has not been categorized into different levels with a view to exposing the varying challenges of reaching common agreement and the kinds of deliberative approaches entailed in each category. In this research, I attempt to provide this categorization in order to clarify the debate.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 299-322 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2019 |
Keywords
- consensus
- deliberation
- facts
- interests
- reasons
- values