The Consensus Project and Three Levels of Deliberation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The basic argument is that the consensus debate has not been very meaningful until now because consensus has not been closely studied as a concept, and deliberation has not been studied precisely in terms of the propensity to reach common agreement. In particular, deliberation - as well as issues for deliberation - has not been categorized into different levels with a view to exposing the varying challenges of reaching common agreement and the kinds of deliberative approaches entailed in each category. In this research, I attempt to provide this categorization in order to clarify the debate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-322
Number of pages24
JournalDialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Keywords

  • consensus
  • deliberation
  • facts
  • interests
  • reasons
  • values

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Consensus Project and Three Levels of Deliberation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this