TY - JOUR
T1 - The 6-star doctor? Physicians' communication of poor prognosis to patients and their families in Cape Coast, Ghana
AU - Caulfield, Alexandra
AU - Plymoth, Amelie
AU - Nartey, Yvonne Ayerki
AU - Mölsted-Alvesson, Helle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020/6/21
Y1 - 2020/6/21
N2 - Introduction Communication is considered a key skill for physicians globally and has formed a central part of medical curricula since the WHO identified it as a key attribute of the â € 5-star doctor'. Communication of poor prognosis to patients and caregivers is particularly challenging, yet an important example of physicians' clinical communication, and a priority within palliative care research. Knowledge is scarce regarding the different positions physicians adopt during poor prognosis communication, especially in sub-Saharan countries. Methods This qualitative study took place at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital in Ghana's Central Region. Physicians in the internal medicine department, with experience in communicating poor prognosis to patients and families on a weekly basis were purposively sampled. Based on the concept of information power, a maximum variation of participants, in terms of age, sex, seniority and experience was achieved after conducting 10 semistructured interviews in March 2019. Positioning theory was used as a theoretical lens to inform study design. The data were analysed through a constructivist thematic analysis approach. Results Physicians adopted six positions, considered as six different themes, during their communication of poor prognosis: clinical expert, educator, counsellor, communicator, protector and mentor. Physicians' choice of position was fluid, guided by local context and wider health system factors. Physicians' desire to communicate with patients and families in a way that met their needs highlighted three key challenges for communication of poor prognosis: linguistic difficulties, pluralistic health beliefs and the role of family. These challenges presented ethical complexities in relation to autonomy and non-maleficence. Conclusion Context is key to physicians' communication of poor prognosis. Communication of poor prognosis is multifaceted, complex and unpredictable. Physicians' communication training should be developed to emphasise contextual circumstances and physician support, and international policy models on physicians' roles developed to include a greater focus on social accountability.
AB - Introduction Communication is considered a key skill for physicians globally and has formed a central part of medical curricula since the WHO identified it as a key attribute of the â € 5-star doctor'. Communication of poor prognosis to patients and caregivers is particularly challenging, yet an important example of physicians' clinical communication, and a priority within palliative care research. Knowledge is scarce regarding the different positions physicians adopt during poor prognosis communication, especially in sub-Saharan countries. Methods This qualitative study took place at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital in Ghana's Central Region. Physicians in the internal medicine department, with experience in communicating poor prognosis to patients and families on a weekly basis were purposively sampled. Based on the concept of information power, a maximum variation of participants, in terms of age, sex, seniority and experience was achieved after conducting 10 semistructured interviews in March 2019. Positioning theory was used as a theoretical lens to inform study design. The data were analysed through a constructivist thematic analysis approach. Results Physicians adopted six positions, considered as six different themes, during their communication of poor prognosis: clinical expert, educator, counsellor, communicator, protector and mentor. Physicians' choice of position was fluid, guided by local context and wider health system factors. Physicians' desire to communicate with patients and families in a way that met their needs highlighted three key challenges for communication of poor prognosis: linguistic difficulties, pluralistic health beliefs and the role of family. These challenges presented ethical complexities in relation to autonomy and non-maleficence. Conclusion Context is key to physicians' communication of poor prognosis. Communication of poor prognosis is multifaceted, complex and unpredictable. Physicians' communication training should be developed to emphasise contextual circumstances and physician support, and international policy models on physicians' roles developed to include a greater focus on social accountability.
KW - Cancer
KW - Disease
KW - Disorder Or injury
KW - Health policy
KW - Other infection
KW - Qualitative study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109082637&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002334
DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002334
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85109082637
SN - 2059-7908
VL - 5
JO - BMJ Global Health
JF - BMJ Global Health
IS - 6
M1 - e002334
ER -