Subtyping children with developmental coordination disorder based on physical fitness outcomes

Wendy Aertssen, Emmanuel Bonney, Gillian Ferguson, Bouwien Smits-Engelsman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) are known to have poor physical fitness. However, differentiating homogenous subgroups of DCD using fitness performance has not yet been established. Therefore the purpose of this study was to identify subtypes in children with and without DCD using measures of physical fitness. Method: Children (aged 6–10 years, n = 217) constituted the sample for this study. They were assessed on 1) aerobic fitness (20m Shuttle Run test), 2) anaerobic fitness (Muscle Power Sprint Test), 3) isometric muscle strength (handheld dynamometry) 4) functional upper and lower body strength (Functional Strength Measurement) and 5) motor coordination [Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2nd edition (MABC-2) test]. The Ward method was used to identify the various clusters. Results: Five subtypes emerged in the entire sample. In the typically developing (TD) children mainly 2 subtypes (number 5 and 2) were found containing 89% of the TD children (n = 55), with the largest group demonstrating above average performance on all measures (cluster 5). Children in subtype 2 had just above average motor coordination and good aerobic fitness but lower muscle strength. Subtypes 1, 3 and 4 were clearly “DCD” clusters, however they showed difference in fitness performance. Subtype 1 contained children with DCD who showed poor performance on all fitness outcomes (n = 45). Children with DCD in subtype 3 had poor aerobic but average strength and anaerobic fitness (n = 48). Subtype 4 contained children with DCD (n = 45) who had good muscle strength and anaerobic fitness. Of these, 36% were at risk of DCD while 24% had definite motor coordination problems. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that children with and without DCD demonstrate heterogeneous physical fitness profiles. The majority of the children (66%) with DCD belonged to subtypes with lower fitness performance. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in other samples of DCD children.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-97
Number of pages11
JournalHuman Movement Science
Volume60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Children
  • Developmental Coordination Disorder
  • Physical fitness
  • Subtypes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Subtyping children with developmental coordination disorder based on physical fitness outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this