TY - JOUR
T1 - Social innovations to increase health coverage
T2 - evidence from a crowdsourcing contest in Ghana
AU - Dako-Gyeke, Phyllis
AU - Asampong, Emmanuel
AU - Opoku-Mensah, Kwabena
AU - Tabong, Philip Teg Nefaah
AU - Awor, Phyllis
AU - Tucker, Joseph D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2022/6/7
Y1 - 2022/6/7
N2 - Objectives Despite progress made to expand access to health service in Ghana, inequities still exist. Social innovations have been developed as community-engaged solutions to decrease inequities. Methods In partnership with a multistakeholder group, our social innovation team organised a crowdsourcing contest to identify health innovations in Ghana. Informed by a WHO-Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases framework, we organised a six-stage crowdsourcing challenge. Results In all, 13 innovations were received in the contest, while 2 innovations were rejected after initial screening. The 11 innovations were reviewed by a panel of four independent expert judges. Inter-rated reliability index (kappa) was 0.86. Following the review of the average score, five top innovations were recognised. These submissions can be put into three main themes: technology and strengthening (eg, mHealth for cervical cancer screening, video directly observed therapy), inclusiveness and reaching the marginalised (people with disability and infertility) and data utilisation for project improvement (seasonal calendar to reduce morbidity and mortality of children under 5 for malaria, diarrhoea and pneumonia). Conclusion In conclusion, this study shows that solutions to local problems exist. Therefore, policymakers, the government and development partners should support the scale-up of such innovations.
AB - Objectives Despite progress made to expand access to health service in Ghana, inequities still exist. Social innovations have been developed as community-engaged solutions to decrease inequities. Methods In partnership with a multistakeholder group, our social innovation team organised a crowdsourcing contest to identify health innovations in Ghana. Informed by a WHO-Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases framework, we organised a six-stage crowdsourcing challenge. Results In all, 13 innovations were received in the contest, while 2 innovations were rejected after initial screening. The 11 innovations were reviewed by a panel of four independent expert judges. Inter-rated reliability index (kappa) was 0.86. Following the review of the average score, five top innovations were recognised. These submissions can be put into three main themes: technology and strengthening (eg, mHealth for cervical cancer screening, video directly observed therapy), inclusiveness and reaching the marginalised (people with disability and infertility) and data utilisation for project improvement (seasonal calendar to reduce morbidity and mortality of children under 5 for malaria, diarrhoea and pneumonia). Conclusion In conclusion, this study shows that solutions to local problems exist. Therefore, policymakers, the government and development partners should support the scale-up of such innovations.
KW - PUBLIC HEALTH
KW - Public health
KW - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131493052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063119
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063119
M3 - Article
C2 - 35672076
AN - SCOPUS:85131493052
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 12
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 6
M1 - e063119
ER -