TY - JOUR
T1 - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A NEWLY DEVELOPED ERGONOMIC ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR UNSTRUCTURED AND UNREGULATED WORK
AU - Yeboah, Nana A.N.
AU - Acquah, Augustine A.
AU - D’souza, Clive
AU - Martin, Bernard J.
AU - Arko-Mensah, John
AU - Fobil, Julius N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Existing ergonomic assessment tools have been designed for routine and structured work making their use in informal work setting challenging due to the high variability in tasks performed by informal workers. The Ergonomic Assessment tool for Unstructured Work (EAUW) was developed by Acquah and colleagues to address this challenge. The tool is efficient and has good inter-observer reliability, but little information is known about its other psychometric properties. This paper assesses the reliability and validity of EAUW. Criterion validity was determined by comparing the EAUW with existing tools for a selected number of e-waste recycling tasks. Intra-observer reliability was determined by comparing observations from the same assessor 5 days apart. Results indicated a high intra-observer agreement for all exposure variables. Compared to existing tools which provide a snapshot of ergonomic exposures, the EAUW provides a more detailed estimate of work exposures between- and within-workers across time.
AB - Existing ergonomic assessment tools have been designed for routine and structured work making their use in informal work setting challenging due to the high variability in tasks performed by informal workers. The Ergonomic Assessment tool for Unstructured Work (EAUW) was developed by Acquah and colleagues to address this challenge. The tool is efficient and has good inter-observer reliability, but little information is known about its other psychometric properties. This paper assesses the reliability and validity of EAUW. Criterion validity was determined by comparing the EAUW with existing tools for a selected number of e-waste recycling tasks. Intra-observer reliability was determined by comparing observations from the same assessor 5 days apart. Results indicated a high intra-observer agreement for all exposure variables. Compared to existing tools which provide a snapshot of ergonomic exposures, the EAUW provides a more detailed estimate of work exposures between- and within-workers across time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190995529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1071181322661339
DO - 10.1177/1071181322661339
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85190995529
SN - 1071-1813
VL - 66
SP - 498
EP - 502
JO - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
JF - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
IS - 1
T2 - 66th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2022
Y2 - 10 October 2022 through 14 October 2022
ER -