Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Price shocks and associated policy responses stemming from the Russia-Ukraine War and other global crises: Evidence from six African countries

  • Emmanuel Mwakiwa
  • , Ayala Wineman
  • , Andrew Agyei-Holmes
  • , Modou Gueye Fall
  • , Lilian Kirimi
  • , Zena Mpenda
  • , Edward Mutandwa
  • , Iredele Ogunbayo
  • , David Tschirley
  • University of Zimbabwe
  • Michigan State University
  • Global Child Nutrition Foundation
  • Bureau d'analyses macro-économiques de l'Institut sénégalais de recherches agricoles
  • Egerton University
  • Sokoine University of Agriculture
  • University of Ibadan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent years have brought a deluge of shocks to agrifood systems, particularly for low- and middle-income countries. These include the Covid-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine War, and manifestations of climate change, among others. This paper quantitatively explores the nature of price shocks in fuel, fertilizer, and foods since 2019 and qualitatively characterizes the policy responses undertaken in six African countries, namely Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe. Results confirm that prices for key foods (maize, rice, wheat, and vegetable oil), fuel, and fertilizer increased markedly in all six countries, with the most rapid increases arriving in 2022. We completed a desk review of relevant policy responses and conducted 104 semi-structured interviews with policy makers and other key stakeholders across the six countries to understand their experiences with, and perspectives on, policy responses to recent and ongoing shocks. These interviews surfaced several themes: (1) Policies exhibit an intensifying emphasis since 2020 on self-sufficiency in food and fertilizer; (2) Though subsidies and tariff reductions are a readily available policy response, the fiscal burden can be quite high; (3) Policy responses to shocks sometimes lack coherence, with some policies offsetting the others’ impacts; (4) While recent shocks triggered some trade realignment, they have not stimulated increased within-Africa (intra-regional) trade; and (5) Policy makers exhibit an increasing appreciation for organic fertilizer and increasingly recognize climate change and associated environmental stress when shaping fertilizer policy. Altogether, these findings underscore a need for more discourse on the most fitting balance between national self-sufficiency and participation in international trade.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100861
JournalGlobal Food Security
Volume45
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Agrifood system
  • Fertilizer
  • Policy response
  • Price shock

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Price shocks and associated policy responses stemming from the Russia-Ukraine War and other global crises: Evidence from six African countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this