Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prevention-intervention strategies to reduce exposure to e-waste

  • Michelle Heacock
  • , Brittany Trottier
  • , Sharad Adhikary
  • , Kwadwo Ansong Asante
  • , Nil Basu
  • , Marie Noel Brune
  • , Jack Caravanos
  • , David Carpenter
  • , Danielle Cazabon
  • , Paromita Chakraborty
  • , Aimin Chen
  • , Fernando DIaz Barriga
  • , Bret Ericson
  • , Julius Fobil
  • , Budi Haryanto
  • , Xia Huo
  • , T. K. Joshi
  • , Philip Landrigan
  • , Adeline Lopez
  • , Frederico Magalini
  • Panida Navasumrit, Antonio Pascale, Sankar Sambandam, Upik Sitti Aslia Kamil, Leith Sly, Peter Sly, Ann Suk, Inoka Suraweera, Ridwan Tamin, Elena Vicario, William Suk
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
  • World Health Organization
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research—Water Research Institute
  • McGill University
  • New York University
  • State University of New York Albany
  • SRM Institute of Science and Technology
  • University of Cincinnati
  • Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí
  • Pure Earth
  • University of Indonesia
  • Jinan University
  • Maulana Azad Medical College
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Michael D. Baker Inc.
  • United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security - UNU-EHS
  • Chulabhorn Research Institute
  • Universidad de la República
  • Ramachandra University
  • Ministry of the Environment and Forestry
  • University of Queensland
  • Biodiversity Sustainable Agriculture Food Sovereignty Action
  • Ministry of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous Medicine
  • Ministry of Environment
  • Médecins du Monde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As one of the largest waste streams, electronic waste (e-waste) production continues to grow in response to global demand for consumer electronics. This waste is often shipped to developing countries where it is disassembled and recycled. In many cases, e-waste recycling activities are conducted in informal settings with very few controls or protections in place for workers. These activities involve exposure to hazardous substances such as cadmium, lead, and brominated flame retardants and are frequently performed by women and children. Although recycling practices and exposures vary by scale and geographic region, we present case studies of e-waste recycling scenarios and intervention approaches to reduce or prevent exposures to the hazardous substances in e-waste that may be broadly applicable to diverse situations. Drawing on parallels identified in these cases, we discuss the future prevention and intervention strategies that recognize the difficult economic realities of informal e-waste recycling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-228
Number of pages10
JournalReviews on Environmental Health
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jun 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • electronic recycling
  • electronic waste (e-waste)
  • environmental health
  • global health
  • intervention
  • prevention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevention-intervention strategies to reduce exposure to e-waste'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this