TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and management of ectopic and molar pregnancies in 17 countries in Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean
T2 - a secondary analysis of the WHO multi-country cross-sectional survey on abortion
AU - Cavalari, Camila Ayume Amano
AU - Mehrtash, Hedieh
AU - Brizuela, Vanessa
AU - Baguiya, Adama
AU - Adu-Bonsaffoh, Kwame
AU - Cecatti, Jose Guilherme
AU - Bahamondes, Luis
AU - Charles, Charles M.poca
AU - Govule, Philip
AU - Dossou, Jean Paul
AU - Souza, Renato T.
AU - Leão, Luis Henrique
AU - Filippi, Veronique
AU - Tunçalp, Özge
AU - Baccaro, Luiz Francisco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© World Health Organization 2024. Licensee BMJ.
PY - 2024/10/14
Y1 - 2024/10/14
N2 - Introduction There are limited global data on ectopic pregnancy (EP) and molar pregnancy (MP), making it important to understand their epidemiology and management across different regions. Our study aimed to describe their prevalence for both conditions, severity of their complications and management among women in selected health facilities across 17 countries in Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Methods This is a secondary analysis of the WHO multi-country survey on abortion. Data were collected from 280 healthcare facilities across 11 countries in Africa and 6 in LAC. Sociodemographic information, signs and symptoms, management and clinical outcomes were extracted from medical records. Facility-level data on post-abortion care (PAC) capabilities were also collected, and facilities were classified accordingly. χ 2 or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical data. Results The total number of women with EP and MP across both regions was 9.9% (2 415/24 424) where EP accounted for 7.8% (1 904/24 424) and MP for 2.1% (511/24 424). EP presented a higher severity of complications than MP. At admission, 49.8% of EP had signs of peritoneal irritation. The most common surgical management for EP was laparotomy (87.2%) and for MP, uterine evacuation (89.8%). Facilities with higher scores in infrastructure and capability to provide PAC more frequently provided minimal invasive management using methotrexate/other medical treatment (34.9%) and laparoscopy (5.1%). Conclusion In Africa and LAC, EP and MP cause significant maternal morbidity and mortality. The disparity in the provision of good quality care highlights the need to strengthen the implementation of evidence-based recommendations in the clinical and surgical management of EP and MP.
AB - Introduction There are limited global data on ectopic pregnancy (EP) and molar pregnancy (MP), making it important to understand their epidemiology and management across different regions. Our study aimed to describe their prevalence for both conditions, severity of their complications and management among women in selected health facilities across 17 countries in Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Methods This is a secondary analysis of the WHO multi-country survey on abortion. Data were collected from 280 healthcare facilities across 11 countries in Africa and 6 in LAC. Sociodemographic information, signs and symptoms, management and clinical outcomes were extracted from medical records. Facility-level data on post-abortion care (PAC) capabilities were also collected, and facilities were classified accordingly. χ 2 or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical data. Results The total number of women with EP and MP across both regions was 9.9% (2 415/24 424) where EP accounted for 7.8% (1 904/24 424) and MP for 2.1% (511/24 424). EP presented a higher severity of complications than MP. At admission, 49.8% of EP had signs of peritoneal irritation. The most common surgical management for EP was laparotomy (87.2%) and for MP, uterine evacuation (89.8%). Facilities with higher scores in infrastructure and capability to provide PAC more frequently provided minimal invasive management using methotrexate/other medical treatment (34.9%) and laparoscopy (5.1%). Conclusion In Africa and LAC, EP and MP cause significant maternal morbidity and mortality. The disparity in the provision of good quality care highlights the need to strengthen the implementation of evidence-based recommendations in the clinical and surgical management of EP and MP.
KW - GYNAECOLOGY
KW - Hospitals, Public
KW - OBSTETRICS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206278566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086723
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086723
M3 - Article
C2 - 39401964
AN - SCOPUS:85206278566
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 14
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 10
M1 - e086723
ER -