Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prevalence and Determinants of the Double Burden of Malnutrition Among Adolescents in Nine Low- and Middle-Income Countries

  • Shuangyu Zhao
  • , Sachin Shinde
  • , Ourohiré Millogo
  • , Rutuja Patil
  • , Justine Bukenya
  • , Angela Chukwu
  • , Nega Assefa
  • , Adom Manu
  • , Mary Mwanyika-Sando
  • , Yifan Gao
  • , Hanxiyue Zhang
  • , Lina Nurhussien
  • , Amani Tinkasimile
  • , Till Bärnighausen
  • , Wafaie W. Fawzi
  • , Kun Tang
  • Tsinghua University
  • University of California at Davis
  • Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • Nouna Health Research Center (CRSN)
  • KEM Hospital
  • Makerere University
  • University of Ibadan
  • Haramaya University
  • Africa Academy for Public Health
  • Heidelberg University 

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The double burden of malnutrition (DBM)—the coexistence of undernutrition and overweight/obesity—poses a significant public health challenge among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study examines the prevalence of underweight, stunting, overweight/obesity, and DBM among adolescents in nine LMICs, and identifies key sociodemographic, behavioral, and digital access factors that shape its distribution. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey across 10 sites in nine LMICs, sampling 11,982 adolescents aged 10–19 years. Nutritional outcomes, including underweight, stunting, overweight/obesity, and DBM (defined as concurrent stunting and overweight/obesity), were assessed using height-for-age and BMI-for-age Z-scores based on the 2007 World Health Organization Growth Reference. Sex-stratified linear and logistic regression models were applied to examine associations between nutritional outcomes and individual- and household-level characteristics at both pooled and country-specific levels, adjusting for site-fixed effects. Results: Overall, 9.5% of adolescents were underweight, 10.7% were stunted, 13.2% were overweight or obese, and 1.4% experienced DBM. Underweight (11.6%) and stunting (12.4%) were more prevalent among male adolescents, while overweight or obesity (16.3%) was more common among female adolescents. Female adolescents were less likely to be underweight (odds ratio [OR] = 0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4–0.6) or stunted (OR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.4–0.7). Low social class was linked to higher odds of underweight (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.5) and stunting (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.7), while being out-of-school increased the risk of DBM (OR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.0, 3.3). Among male adolescents, lack of digital exposure was associated with increased stunting risk but decreased overweight or obesity risk, and insufficient physical activity increased the risk of both outcomes. Discussion: Adolescent DBM in LMICs is shaped by intersecting economic, educational, behavioral, and digital determinants, with distinct gender patterns. These findings underscore the urgency of integrated interventions—combining poverty alleviation, school retention, promotion of physical activity, and targeted online nutrition education—that are tailored to national and gender-specific contexts. Addressing these factors could reduce both undernutrition and obesity, with long-term benefits for adolescent health trajectories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)521-531
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume78
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  3. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Adolescent Nutrition
  • Double burden of malnutrition
  • Low- and middle-income countries
  • Overweight and obesity
  • undernutrition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence and Determinants of the Double Burden of Malnutrition Among Adolescents in Nine Low- and Middle-Income Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this