TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infections among healthcare workers in a tertiary hospital in Ghana
AU - Marfoh, Kissinger
AU - Samba, Ali
AU - Okyere, Eunice
AU - Fattah, Ahmad Zaid
AU - Darko, Dorothy Naa Ashokor
AU - Odoom, Prince Nuertey
AU - Ashaley, Michael Darko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Marfoh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Introduction Vaccines remain the most effective preventive measure against the ever-changing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. However, vaccine access remains unequal, leaving healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Ghana at increased risk, despite early prioritisation. These inequities threaten both individual safety and the resilience of health systems. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infections continue to occur, particularly with emerging variants, compounding these risks. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infections among healthcare workers at a tertiary hospital in Ghana following the administration of the ChAdOx1nCoV-19 vaccine. Method We conducted a prospective cohort study of 4252 healthcare workers aged 18 and above, who tested negative for the SARS-CoV-2, and partially or fully vaccinated with the ChAdOx1nCoV-19 vaccine at baseline. After completing the baseline questionnaire, healthcare workers were followed up for one year. Results 2283 out of the 4252 (53.7%) healthcare workers had post-vaccination infections, with an overall incidence of 95.7 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI: 91.8–99.7) of follow-up. The incidence of breakthrough infection was 82.0 cases per 100 person-years (95% Cl 78.0–86.0). In a multivariable Cox regression, age, vaccination status, occupation, clinical stations, frontline status and previous SARS-CoV-2 infections were significantly associated with post-vaccination infections. Compared to non-clinical healthcare workers, nurses (HR=1.91, 95% CI: 1.69–2.17) and doctors (HR=1.37, 95% CI: 1.24–1.73) had a higher risk of post-vaccination infections. Similarly, elderly individuals (HR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.05) and those with comorbidities (HR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.67–1.73) were more likely to develop post-vaccination infections. Frontline healthcare workers and healthcare workers stationed at the point-of-entry services (emergency and outpatient clinics) had a high rate of infections. However, previous SARS-CoV-2 infections (HR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.71–0.53) and full vaccination (HR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.51–0.62) conferred some protection, despite an overall rise in infection post vaccination incidence. Conclusion In conclusion, the results of our study suggest a high incidence of post-vaccination infections among healthcare workers in the context of varying epidemic waves. Additionally, the study identified partial or incomplete vaccination, elderly workers, comorbidities, frontline workers, nurses and point-of-entry service roles as high-risk factors for post-vaccination infections. These findings reinforce the need for tailored booster strategies and strengthened protection for high-risk healthcare workers in LMIC settings.
AB - Introduction Vaccines remain the most effective preventive measure against the ever-changing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. However, vaccine access remains unequal, leaving healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Ghana at increased risk, despite early prioritisation. These inequities threaten both individual safety and the resilience of health systems. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infections continue to occur, particularly with emerging variants, compounding these risks. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infections among healthcare workers at a tertiary hospital in Ghana following the administration of the ChAdOx1nCoV-19 vaccine. Method We conducted a prospective cohort study of 4252 healthcare workers aged 18 and above, who tested negative for the SARS-CoV-2, and partially or fully vaccinated with the ChAdOx1nCoV-19 vaccine at baseline. After completing the baseline questionnaire, healthcare workers were followed up for one year. Results 2283 out of the 4252 (53.7%) healthcare workers had post-vaccination infections, with an overall incidence of 95.7 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI: 91.8–99.7) of follow-up. The incidence of breakthrough infection was 82.0 cases per 100 person-years (95% Cl 78.0–86.0). In a multivariable Cox regression, age, vaccination status, occupation, clinical stations, frontline status and previous SARS-CoV-2 infections were significantly associated with post-vaccination infections. Compared to non-clinical healthcare workers, nurses (HR=1.91, 95% CI: 1.69–2.17) and doctors (HR=1.37, 95% CI: 1.24–1.73) had a higher risk of post-vaccination infections. Similarly, elderly individuals (HR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.05) and those with comorbidities (HR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.67–1.73) were more likely to develop post-vaccination infections. Frontline healthcare workers and healthcare workers stationed at the point-of-entry services (emergency and outpatient clinics) had a high rate of infections. However, previous SARS-CoV-2 infections (HR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.71–0.53) and full vaccination (HR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.51–0.62) conferred some protection, despite an overall rise in infection post vaccination incidence. Conclusion In conclusion, the results of our study suggest a high incidence of post-vaccination infections among healthcare workers in the context of varying epidemic waves. Additionally, the study identified partial or incomplete vaccination, elderly workers, comorbidities, frontline workers, nurses and point-of-entry service roles as high-risk factors for post-vaccination infections. These findings reinforce the need for tailored booster strategies and strengthened protection for high-risk healthcare workers in LMIC settings.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016101254
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0331971
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0331971
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105016101254
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 20
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 9 September
M1 - e0331971
ER -