Performance evaluation of infiltration models under different tillage operations in a tropical climate

Land management practices have the propensity to influence soil infiltration characteristics and predictability of infiltration models. This study was conducted to evaluate the performances of the Kostiakov model, the Philip model and the Horton model in predicting cumulative infiltration depth under four tillage systems in a sandy clay loam: (i) No Tillage (NT), (ii) Reduced Tillage (RT), (iii) Ploughing followed by Harrowing and Ridging (PHR), and (iv) Deep tillage followed by Ploughing, Harrowing and Ridging (DPHR). Using the double ring infiltrometer to measure the infiltration rate, the observed data was fitted to the infiltration models and their goodness of fit was verified by Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and paired sample t-test. The results show that the Kostiakov model exhibited the highest accuracy with the highest R² and NSE values (R²≥0.9967 and NSE ≥ 0.9965) and lowest errors (RMSE≤ 1.16 mm and MAE ≤ 0.98 mm). The comparison of the performances of the models in predicting the cumulative infiltration depth revealed that the Kostiakov model is superior to the Philip and the Horton models under all the Tillage systems, as the Philip and the Horton models underestimated and overestimated the observed data at the initial and latter parts of the experiment, respectively. The observed and predicted cumulative infiltration depth compared using the paired sample t-test showed that the Kostiakov model was better than the Horton and the Philip models under NT, RT and PHR, while the Horton model predicted better on the DPHR than the Kostiakov and the Philip models. The infiltration capacities of the conservation tillage practices (NT and RT) were higher than the conventional tillage conditions (PHR and DPHR). However, the performance of the evaluated models in predicting cumulative infiltration shows that the measured infiltration was best simulated for the DPHR followed by the PHR, RT and NT tillage practices. From our study the Kostiakov model precisely predicted the cumulative infiltration depth relative to the Horton and Philip models. It is, therefore, the preferred choice for modelling cumulative infiltration depth in the ochrosols of the study area and under verified field conditions, these models can be applied to determine the suitable infiltration characteristics to minimise deep percolation and run off losses in irrigation scheduling.