TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing Packet Size for Enhanced Performance in Wireless Sensor Networks for Environmental Monitoring Applications
AU - Engmann, Felicia
AU - Adu-Manu, Kofi Sarpong
AU - Abdulai, Jamal Deen
AU - Katsriku, Ferdinand Apietu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are widely used in environmental monitoring applications (EMAs) for water quality, air quality, and structural health monitoring. However, the performance of WSNs in EMAs depends on various network parameters such as packet size, data rate, and bit error rate. Packet size affects network reliability, which is evident in performance metrics, such as energy consumption, delay, and throughput. In this study, we investigated a method used to measure the effect of packet size on the performance of an IEEE 802.11 network in typical EMAs. The NS-3 network simulator compares the packet sizes (32, 64, 128, 512, and 1024 bytes) for different network densities (100, 120, 140, 160, 180, and 200 nodes, respectively) in a 100 × 100 m square area. This paper provides a comprehensive performance analysis of WSN applications for different node densities for performance metrics such as energy consumption, latency, and packet delivery ratios. The study also found intermediate packet sizes of 64 and 128 bytes, proving improved network performance for the chosen performance metrics. The results were validated against results from related studies on WSN implementation in smart grids and other underwater communications. We report that the optimum average end-to-end delay achieved in our simulations was 10.88 s for the 128-byte packet size, whereas the optimum packet delivery ratio was 0.178 for the 64-byte channel. The remaining energy on the channel was 27.9% for 64 bytes, which is better than other channels with 25% energy remaining.
AB - Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are widely used in environmental monitoring applications (EMAs) for water quality, air quality, and structural health monitoring. However, the performance of WSNs in EMAs depends on various network parameters such as packet size, data rate, and bit error rate. Packet size affects network reliability, which is evident in performance metrics, such as energy consumption, delay, and throughput. In this study, we investigated a method used to measure the effect of packet size on the performance of an IEEE 802.11 network in typical EMAs. The NS-3 network simulator compares the packet sizes (32, 64, 128, 512, and 1024 bytes) for different network densities (100, 120, 140, 160, 180, and 200 nodes, respectively) in a 100 × 100 m square area. This paper provides a comprehensive performance analysis of WSN applications for different node densities for performance metrics such as energy consumption, latency, and packet delivery ratios. The study also found intermediate packet sizes of 64 and 128 bytes, proving improved network performance for the chosen performance metrics. The results were validated against results from related studies on WSN implementation in smart grids and other underwater communications. We report that the optimum average end-to-end delay achieved in our simulations was 10.88 s for the 128-byte packet size, whereas the optimum packet delivery ratio was 0.178 for the 64-byte channel. The remaining energy on the channel was 27.9% for 64 bytes, which is better than other channels with 25% energy remaining.
KW - IEEE 802.11
KW - environmental monitoring
KW - environmental monitoring applications (EMAs)
KW - wireless sensor networks
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015083049
U2 - 10.1002/dac.70253
DO - 10.1002/dac.70253
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105015083049
SN - 1074-5351
VL - 38
JO - International Journal of Communication Systems
JF - International Journal of Communication Systems
IS - 15
M1 - e70253
ER -