No evidence of MMR induced trained immunity to prevent SARS COV2: results from a multi-centre RCT

  • Sinead Delany-Moretlwe
  • , Hakim Moulay Dehbi
  • , Izukanji Sikazwe
  • , George Kyei
  • , Kwadwo Koram
  • , Erik Dubberke
  • , Noluthando Mwelase
  • , Dominic Hague
  • , Linda Gail Bekker
  • , Linda Yun
  • , Annalene Nel
  • , Leon du Toit
  • , Bruce Biccard
  • , Katherine Gill
  • , Chikumbutso Chipeta
  • , Kathryn T. Mngadi
  • , Limakatso Lebina
  • , Reshmi Dassaye
  • , Villeshni Asari
  • , Samantha H. Fry
  • Edwin Turton, Khatija Ahmed, Kwadwo Kusi, Susan Adu-Amankwah, Roma Chilengi, Joyce Chinyama Chilekwa, Laurence Lovat, Dermot McGuckin, Emilia Caverly, Mary Politi, Ben Swan, Anne DeSchryver, Sherry McKinnon, Ananya Gupta, Gemma Jones, Nicholas Freemantle, Shabaana Khader, Helen Rees, Mihai G. Netea, S. Ramani Moonesinghe, Michael S. Avidan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Measles-containing vaccines (MCV), by training innate immune cells, are hypothesized to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: In this international, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned adults, 18 years and older, to receive MCV or saline. The primary outcome was polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed symptomatic COVID-19, up to 60 days after intervention. Secondary outcomes were PCR-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 and serologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, up to 150 days after intervention. Results: Of 3411 randomised participants, the modified intention-to-treat population included 1607 in the MCV and 1545 in the saline group. The estimated risk of symptomatic COVID-19 by 60 days was 1.5% in the MCV and 1.2% in the saline group (risk difference, 0.3 percentage points, 95% CI, -0.5 to 1.1; p=0.52). At 150 days, these percentages were 4.1% (65/1585) and 4.1% (64/1544) in the MCV and saline groups, respectively (risk difference, 0.04 percentage points, 95% CI, -1.4 to 1.3; p=0.95). Based on serology results available at 0 and 150 days, 10.6% (100/945) of participants in the MCV and 10.3% (98/951) in the saline group had infection with SARS-CoV-2 over the course of the trial (risk difference, 0.3 percentage points, 95% CI, -2.6 to 3.1; p=0.84). Three patients were hospitalised with COVID-19 disease in the MCV and one in the saline group. Conclusions: Administering MCVs to stimulate trained immunity did not prevent COVID-19 or SARS-CoV2 infection. Stimulating trained immunity might not be useful for preventing respiratory illness during future pandemics. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04333732.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1588190
JournalFrontiers in Immunology
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • measles
  • measles containing vaccines
  • mumps
  • prevention
  • rubella
  • trained immunity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'No evidence of MMR induced trained immunity to prevent SARS COV2: results from a multi-centre RCT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this