TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter, international study of CT practices and radiation doses from 10 African countries
T2 - An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) baseline study
AU - Dasegowda, Giridhar
AU - Mikhail Lette, Miriam
AU - Achoki, Stacy
AU - Affes, Meriem
AU - Baichoo, Saraswati
AU - Karout, Lina
AU - Chammakhi, Chiraz
AU - Elsheikh, Rehab
AU - Abdoelrahman Hassan, A. B.
AU - Husseiny, Dina
AU - Ibrahim, Omyma G.
AU - Inkoom, Stephen
AU - Kawooya, Michael
AU - Kisembo, Harriet
AU - Lachgar, Amine
AU - Malumba, Richard
AU - Mensah, Yaw B.
AU - Mubarak Musa, Keffi
AU - Nidjergou, Lisa
AU - Nunoo, George
AU - Nyabanda, Rose
AU - Okoko, Elly O.
AU - Tahiri, Zakaria
AU - Talbi, Mohammed
AU - Kalra, Mannudeep K.
AU - Gershan, Vesna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Purpose: The objective of our IAEA-coordinated international study was to assess CT practices and radiation doses from multiple hospitals across several African countries. Methods: The study included 13 hospitals from Africa which contributed information on minimum of 20 consecutive patients who underwent head, chest, and/or abdomen-pelvis CT. Prior to the data recording step, all hospitals had a mandatory one-hour training on the best practices in recording the relevant data elements. The recorded data elements included patient age, weight, protocol name, scanner information, acquisition parameters, and radiation dose descriptors including phase-specific CT dose index volume (CTDIvol in mGy) and dose length product (DLP in mGy.cm). We estimated the median and interquartile range of body-region specific CTDIvol and DLP and compared data across sites and countries using the Kruskal-Wallis H Test for non-normal distribution, analysis of variance. Results: A total of 1061 patients (mean age 50 ± 19 years) were included in the study. 16 % of CT exams had no stated clinical indications for CT examinations of the head (32/343, 9 %), chest (50/281, 18 %), abdomen-pelvis (67/243, 28 %), and/or chest-abdomen-pelvis CT (24/194, 12 %). Most hospitals used multiphase CT protocols for abdomen-pelvis (9/11 hospitals) and chest CT (10/12 hospitals), regardless of clinical indications. Total median DLP values for head (953 mGy.cm), chest (405 mGy.cm), and abdomen-pelvis (1195 mGy.cm) CT were above the UK, German, and American College of Radiology Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). Conclusions: Concerning variations in CT practices and protocols across several hospitals in Africa were demonstrated, emphasizing the need for better protocol optimization to improve patient safety.
AB - Purpose: The objective of our IAEA-coordinated international study was to assess CT practices and radiation doses from multiple hospitals across several African countries. Methods: The study included 13 hospitals from Africa which contributed information on minimum of 20 consecutive patients who underwent head, chest, and/or abdomen-pelvis CT. Prior to the data recording step, all hospitals had a mandatory one-hour training on the best practices in recording the relevant data elements. The recorded data elements included patient age, weight, protocol name, scanner information, acquisition parameters, and radiation dose descriptors including phase-specific CT dose index volume (CTDIvol in mGy) and dose length product (DLP in mGy.cm). We estimated the median and interquartile range of body-region specific CTDIvol and DLP and compared data across sites and countries using the Kruskal-Wallis H Test for non-normal distribution, analysis of variance. Results: A total of 1061 patients (mean age 50 ± 19 years) were included in the study. 16 % of CT exams had no stated clinical indications for CT examinations of the head (32/343, 9 %), chest (50/281, 18 %), abdomen-pelvis (67/243, 28 %), and/or chest-abdomen-pelvis CT (24/194, 12 %). Most hospitals used multiphase CT protocols for abdomen-pelvis (9/11 hospitals) and chest CT (10/12 hospitals), regardless of clinical indications. Total median DLP values for head (953 mGy.cm), chest (405 mGy.cm), and abdomen-pelvis (1195 mGy.cm) CT were above the UK, German, and American College of Radiology Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). Conclusions: Concerning variations in CT practices and protocols across several hospitals in Africa were demonstrated, emphasizing the need for better protocol optimization to improve patient safety.
KW - Clinical reasoning
KW - Diagnostic reference levels
KW - Radiation dosage
KW - Radiation protection
KW - X-Ray computerized tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199480743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103431
DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103431
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85199480743
SN - 1120-1797
VL - 124
JO - Physica Medica
JF - Physica Medica
M1 - 103431
ER -