TY - JOUR
T1 - Mosquito control by abatement programmes in the United States
T2 - perspectives and lessons for countries in sub-Saharan Africa
AU - Ochomo, Eric
AU - Rund, Samuel S.C.
AU - Mthawanji, Rosheen S.
AU - Antonio-Nkondjio, Christophe
AU - Machani, Maxwell
AU - Samake, Siriman
AU - Wolie, Rosine Z.
AU - Nsango, Sandrine
AU - Lown, Laurel Anne
AU - Matoke-Muhia, Damaris
AU - Kamau, Luna
AU - Lukyamuzi, Edward
AU - Njeri, Jane
AU - Chabi, Joseph
AU - Akrofi, Otubea Owusu
AU - Ntege, Charles
AU - Mero, Victor
AU - Mwalimu, Charles
AU - Kiware, Samson
AU - Bilgo, Etienne
AU - Traoré, Mohamed Moumine
AU - Afrane, Yaw
AU - Hakizimana, Emmanuel
AU - Muleba, Mbanga
AU - Orefuwa, Emma
AU - Chaki, Prosper
AU - Juma, Elijah Omondi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Africa and the United States are both large, heterogeneous geographies with a diverse range of ecologies, climates and mosquito species diversity which contribute to disease transmission and nuisance biting. In the United States, mosquito control is nationally, and regionally coordinated and in so much as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) provides guidance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides pesticide registration, and the states provide legal authority and oversight, the implementation is usually decentralized to the state, county, or city level. Mosquito control operations are organized, in most instances, into fully independent mosquito abatement districts, public works departments, local health departments. In some cases, municipalities engage independent private contractors to undertake mosquito control within their jurisdictions. In sub–Saharan Africa (SSA), where most vector-borne disease endemic countries lie, mosquito control is organized centrally at the national level. In this model, the disease control programmes (national malaria control programmes or national malaria elimination programmes (NMCP/NMEP)) are embedded within the central governments’ ministries of health (MoHs) and drive vector control policy development and implementation. Because of the high disease burden and limited resources, the primary endpoint of mosquito control in these settings is reduction of mosquito borne diseases, primarily, malaria. In the United States, however, the endpoint is mosquito control, therefore, significant (or even greater) emphasis is laid on nuisance mosquitoes as much as disease vectors. The authors detail experiences and learnings gathered by the delegation of African vector control professionals that participated in a formal exchange programme initiated by the Pan-African Mosquito Control Association (PAMCA), the University of Notre Dame, and members of the American Mosquito Control Association (AMCA), in the United States between the year 2021 and 2022. The authors highlight the key components of mosquito control operations in the United States and compare them to mosquito control programmes in SSA countries endemic for vector-borne diseases, deriving important lessons that could be useful for vector control in SSA.
AB - Africa and the United States are both large, heterogeneous geographies with a diverse range of ecologies, climates and mosquito species diversity which contribute to disease transmission and nuisance biting. In the United States, mosquito control is nationally, and regionally coordinated and in so much as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) provides guidance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides pesticide registration, and the states provide legal authority and oversight, the implementation is usually decentralized to the state, county, or city level. Mosquito control operations are organized, in most instances, into fully independent mosquito abatement districts, public works departments, local health departments. In some cases, municipalities engage independent private contractors to undertake mosquito control within their jurisdictions. In sub–Saharan Africa (SSA), where most vector-borne disease endemic countries lie, mosquito control is organized centrally at the national level. In this model, the disease control programmes (national malaria control programmes or national malaria elimination programmes (NMCP/NMEP)) are embedded within the central governments’ ministries of health (MoHs) and drive vector control policy development and implementation. Because of the high disease burden and limited resources, the primary endpoint of mosquito control in these settings is reduction of mosquito borne diseases, primarily, malaria. In the United States, however, the endpoint is mosquito control, therefore, significant (or even greater) emphasis is laid on nuisance mosquitoes as much as disease vectors. The authors detail experiences and learnings gathered by the delegation of African vector control professionals that participated in a formal exchange programme initiated by the Pan-African Mosquito Control Association (PAMCA), the University of Notre Dame, and members of the American Mosquito Control Association (AMCA), in the United States between the year 2021 and 2022. The authors highlight the key components of mosquito control operations in the United States and compare them to mosquito control programmes in SSA countries endemic for vector-borne diseases, deriving important lessons that could be useful for vector control in SSA.
KW - Integrated vector management
KW - Larval source management
KW - Mosquito abatement districts
KW - Mosquito control
KW - Surveillance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181515942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12936-023-04829-3
DO - 10.1186/s12936-023-04829-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 38178145
AN - SCOPUS:85181515942
SN - 1475-2875
VL - 23
JO - Malaria Journal
JF - Malaria Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 8
ER -