Mentally disordered offenders and the law: Research update on the insanity defense, 2004–2019

Samuel Adjorlolo, Heng Choon (Oliver) Chan, Matt DeLisi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The insanity defense is among the most controversial legal constructs that has attracted the attention of scholars, practitioners and policy makers. Here, we conducted a systematic review of the literature spanning 2004 to 2019 that produced 58 studies of insanity defense research. Findings are organized according to: (1) assessments and assessment-related issues, (2) juror decision-making in defense trials, (3) characteristics of insanity acquittees, (4) release recommendations for insanity acquittees, (5) revocation of conditional release status of insanity acquittees, and (6) additional areas of insanity defense research. Implications of the research for the insanity defense and cognate legal issues are proffered.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101507
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volume67
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • Insanity defense
  • Insanity plea
  • Mentally disordered offenders
  • Psychopathology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mentally disordered offenders and the law: Research update on the insanity defense, 2004–2019'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this