Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Malaria Transmission Intensity Likely Modifies RTS, S/AS01 Efficacy Due to a Rebound Effect in Ghana, Malawi, and Gabon

  • Griffin J. Bell
  • , Varun Goel
  • , Paulin Essone
  • , David Dosoo
  • , Bright Adu
  • , Benedicta Ayiedu Mensah
  • , Stephaney Gyaase
  • , Kenneth Wiru
  • , Fabrice Mougeni
  • , Musah Osei
  • , Pamela Minsoko
  • , Cyrus Sinai
  • , Karamoko Niaré
  • , Jonathan J. Juliano
  • , Michael Hudgens
  • , Anita Ghansah
  • , Portia Kamthunzi
  • , Tisungane Mvalo
  • , Selidji Todagbe Agnandji
  • , Jeffrey A. Bailey
  • Kwaku Poku Asante, Michael Emch
  • University of North Carolina
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Centre de Recherches Médicales en Lambaréné (Cermel)
  • Kintampo Health Research Centre
  • University of Ghana
  • Brown University
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of Tübingen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. RTS,S/AS01 is the first malaria vaccine to be approved and recommended for widespread implementation by the World Health Organization (WHO). Trials reported lower vaccine efficacies in higher-incidence sites, potentially due to a “rebound” in malaria cases in vaccinated children. When naturally acquired protection in the control group rises and vaccine protection in the vaccinated wanes concurrently, malaria incidence can become greater in the vaccinated than in the control group, resulting in negative vaccine efficacies. Methods. Using data from the 2009–2014 phase III trial (NCT00866619) in Lilongwe, Malawi; Kintampo, Ghana; and Lambaréné, Gabon, we evaluate this hypothesis by estimating malaria incidence in each vaccine group over time and in varying transmission settings. After estimating transmission intensities using ecological variables, we fit models with 3-way interactions between vaccination, time, and transmission intensity. Results. Over time, incidence decreased in the control group and increased in the vaccine group. Three-dose efficacy in the lowest-transmission-intensity group (0.25 cases per person-year [CPPY]) decreased from 88.2% to 15.0% over 4.5 years, compared with 81.6% to −27.7% in the highest-transmission-intensity group (3 CPPY). Conclusions. These findings suggest that interventions, including the fourth RTS,S dose, that protect vaccinated individuals during the potential rebound period should be implemented for high-transmission settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1646-1656
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Infectious Diseases
Volume226
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Africa
  • GIS
  • geographic information system
  • malaria
  • vaccine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Malaria Transmission Intensity Likely Modifies RTS, S/AS01 Efficacy Due to a Rebound Effect in Ghana, Malawi, and Gabon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this