Abstract
A political challenge facing constitutional democracies in Africa is the lack of adequate representation and participation of citizens in democratic processes and institutions. This challenge is manifest in the vesting of power solely in, and the exercise of this power by, a sectional group – the majority party – to the exclusion of others; as evinced in the liberal democratic systems extensively practised on the continent. Wiredu proposes as a solution to these challenges the adoption of consensual democracy; an indigenous, non-party democratic system rooted in the traditional African humanist and communitarian conceptions of the individual and the community, in which political decisions are characteristically reached by consensus. In this article, I present a critical exposition of Wiredu’s consensual democracy and defend it against liberal democracy on the one hand, and criticisms levelled against it on the other hand. I also offer some modifications to Wiredu’s theory in a bid to render it more suitable for practice in Africa.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 445-466 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | European Journal of Political Theory |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2016 |
Keywords
- Consensual democracy
- consensus
- deliberation
- democracy
- liberal democracy
- liberalism
- majoritarian democracy
- representation