TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrating Qualitative Techniques in Model Development
T2 - A Case Study Using the Framework Approach
AU - Frempong, Samuel N.
AU - Davenport, Clare
AU - Sutton, Andrew J.
AU - Nonvignon, Justice
AU - Barton, Pelham
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Background: Despite their potential, there is limited uptake of formal qualitative methods in model development by modellers and health economists. The aim of this case study was to highlight in a real-world context how a qualitative approach has been applied to gain insight into current practice (delineating existing care pathways) for typhoid fever in Ghana, which can then assist in model structure conceptualisation in a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: The perspectives of a range of healthcare professionals working in different settings and across different practices in the Eastern region of Ghana were captured with a self-administered survey using open-ended questions and analysed using the framework method. Results: A total of 51 completed questionnaires were retrieved representing a 73% response rate. It was found that two main care pathways for typhoid fever exist in Ghana and there was no consensus on how a new test might be applied to the existing pathways. Conclusion: The two settings in Ghana have different care pathways and any cost-effectiveness analysis should consider the alternative pathways separately. This study demonstrated that framework analysis is a qualitative methodology that is likely to be accessible and feasible across a wide range of health economic settings.
AB - Background: Despite their potential, there is limited uptake of formal qualitative methods in model development by modellers and health economists. The aim of this case study was to highlight in a real-world context how a qualitative approach has been applied to gain insight into current practice (delineating existing care pathways) for typhoid fever in Ghana, which can then assist in model structure conceptualisation in a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: The perspectives of a range of healthcare professionals working in different settings and across different practices in the Eastern region of Ghana were captured with a self-administered survey using open-ended questions and analysed using the framework method. Results: A total of 51 completed questionnaires were retrieved representing a 73% response rate. It was found that two main care pathways for typhoid fever exist in Ghana and there was no consensus on how a new test might be applied to the existing pathways. Conclusion: The two settings in Ghana have different care pathways and any cost-effectiveness analysis should consider the alternative pathways separately. This study demonstrated that framework analysis is a qualitative methodology that is likely to be accessible and feasible across a wide range of health economic settings.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85050184538
U2 - 10.1007/s40258-018-0411-9
DO - 10.1007/s40258-018-0411-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 30022439
AN - SCOPUS:85050184538
SN - 1175-5652
VL - 16
SP - 723
EP - 733
JO - Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
JF - Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
IS - 5
ER -