TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated life cycle assessment-systems thinking approach for medical waste management in Ghanaian hospitals
AU - Asare, Ebenezer Aquisman
AU - Abdul-Wahab, Dickson
AU - Kaufmann, Elsie Effah
AU - Wahi, Rafeah
AU - Ngaini, Zainab
AU - Buah-Kwofie, Archibold
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - This study integrates life-cycle assessment (LCA) with systems-thinking to evaluate medical-waste treatment options in five Ghanaian hospitals (KBTH, KATH, CCTH, BRH, UCCH). Using a functional unit of 1 kg mixed hospital waste, inventories were modelled in Brightway2/biosphere3 and characterised with CML v4.8 across eight impact categories. We compared current practice and five improvement scenarios and ranked options via entropy-weighted TOPSIS. Autoclaving emerged as the optimal treatment method with a TOPSIS score of 0.994 (CI: 0.992–0.997), followed by pyrolysis (0.990) and microwave treatment (0.986), while incineration plus landfill performed worst across toxicity and climate indicators. Reductions reported herein are relative (%) changes versus the baseline scenario at each facility. Scenario analysis demonstrates that smaller facilities can achieve complete impact reductions (-100 %) across most environmental categories through improved segregation and technology adoption, while larger facilities show varied improvements ranging from −56.4 % to −84.8 % relative to the baseline. Sensitivity analysis indicated that incineration and landfill treatments are highly sensitive to waste composition and segregation efficiency. Systems-feedback analysis highlights waste-segregation efficiency and emission controls as dominant levers. Findings indicate that upgrading segregation to ≥ 80–95 % and deploying non-burn technologies can yield large relative reductions in human-toxicity and climate-change impacts, supporting Ghana's policy goals. This combined LCA–systems framework provides a transparent, replicable decision basis for hospital and regional planners. This is the first Ghana-focused framework that integrates LCA, systems thinking, and MCDA to rank hospital waste-treatment choices under uncertainty, quantifying facility-specific, relative impact reductions. It operationalizes evidence into a replicable decision tool for Cleaner Production in LMIC health systems. Practical relevance: across five Ghanaian hospitals, pairing non-burn treatment with ≥ 80–95 % segregation delivers 56–100 % relative reductions in toxicity indicators and ∼75–89 % in climate-change impacts versus baseline. The integrated LCA–systems–MCDA tool is directly usable by hospital planners for Cleaner Production decisions.
AB - This study integrates life-cycle assessment (LCA) with systems-thinking to evaluate medical-waste treatment options in five Ghanaian hospitals (KBTH, KATH, CCTH, BRH, UCCH). Using a functional unit of 1 kg mixed hospital waste, inventories were modelled in Brightway2/biosphere3 and characterised with CML v4.8 across eight impact categories. We compared current practice and five improvement scenarios and ranked options via entropy-weighted TOPSIS. Autoclaving emerged as the optimal treatment method with a TOPSIS score of 0.994 (CI: 0.992–0.997), followed by pyrolysis (0.990) and microwave treatment (0.986), while incineration plus landfill performed worst across toxicity and climate indicators. Reductions reported herein are relative (%) changes versus the baseline scenario at each facility. Scenario analysis demonstrates that smaller facilities can achieve complete impact reductions (-100 %) across most environmental categories through improved segregation and technology adoption, while larger facilities show varied improvements ranging from −56.4 % to −84.8 % relative to the baseline. Sensitivity analysis indicated that incineration and landfill treatments are highly sensitive to waste composition and segregation efficiency. Systems-feedback analysis highlights waste-segregation efficiency and emission controls as dominant levers. Findings indicate that upgrading segregation to ≥ 80–95 % and deploying non-burn technologies can yield large relative reductions in human-toxicity and climate-change impacts, supporting Ghana's policy goals. This combined LCA–systems framework provides a transparent, replicable decision basis for hospital and regional planners. This is the first Ghana-focused framework that integrates LCA, systems thinking, and MCDA to rank hospital waste-treatment choices under uncertainty, quantifying facility-specific, relative impact reductions. It operationalizes evidence into a replicable decision tool for Cleaner Production in LMIC health systems. Practical relevance: across five Ghanaian hospitals, pairing non-burn treatment with ≥ 80–95 % segregation delivers 56–100 % relative reductions in toxicity indicators and ∼75–89 % in climate-change impacts versus baseline. The integrated LCA–systems–MCDA tool is directly usable by hospital planners for Cleaner Production decisions.
KW - Autoclaving
KW - Environmental emissions
KW - Incineration
KW - Multi-criteria analysis
KW - Waste segregation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015609585
U2 - 10.1016/j.clwat.2025.100130
DO - 10.1016/j.clwat.2025.100130
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105015609585
SN - 2950-2632
VL - 4
JO - Cleaner Water
JF - Cleaner Water
M1 - 100130
ER -