TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength
AU - Agtuahene, Mercy A.
AU - Quartey, Jonathan
AU - Kwakye, Samuel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness. Objectives: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana. Method: In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired t-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results: The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m2 (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (r = 0.492; p < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (r = 0.290; p < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (r = 0.001; p = 0.982). Conclusion: Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females. Clinical implications: Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.
AB - Background: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness. Objectives: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana. Method: In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired t-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results: The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m2 (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (r = 0.492; p < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (r = 0.290; p < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (r = 0.001; p = 0.982). Conclusion: Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females. Clinical implications: Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.
KW - body mass index
KW - dynamometer
KW - hand dominance
KW - hand grip strength
KW - non-dominant hand
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175060542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923
DO - 10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175060542
SN - 0379-6175
VL - 79
JO - South African Journal of Physiotherapy
JF - South African Journal of Physiotherapy
IS - 1
M1 - a1923
ER -