Abstract
The International Bill of Human Rights (IBHR) enjoys universal acclaim as the source of the best standards and definition of human rights. This paper argues that the IBHR is inspired by liberalism and harbours ambiguities that open the door to a neoliberal seizure of the rights agenda; and that this effectively destabilises the focus on the IBHR on socio-economic and community rights, and therefore its stated ideal of the equal value of all human rights. I argue that Kwame Gyekye's moderate communitarian political philosophy affords a viable philosophical basis for justification of a more balanced conception of human rights than the theoretical basis of the IBHR does.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 491-503 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | South African Journal of Philosophy |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Oct 2015 |