Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys

  • Meghan A. Bohren
  • , Hedieh Mehrtash
  • , Bukola Fawole
  • , Thae Maung Maung
  • , Mamadou Dioulde Balde
  • , Ernest Maya
  • , Soe Soe Thwin
  • , Adeniyi K. Aderoba
  • , Joshua P. Vogel
  • , Theresa Azonima Irinyenikan
  • , A. Olusoji Adeyanju
  • , Nwe Oo Mon
  • , Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh
  • , Sihem Landoulsi
  • , Chris Guure
  • , Richard Adanu
  • , Boubacar Alpha Diallo
  • , A. Metin Gülmezoglu
  • , Anne Marie Soumah
  • , Alpha Oumar Sall
  • Özge Tunçalp
  • University of Melbourne
  • World Health Organization
  • University of Ibadan
  • Department of Medical Research
  • Cellule de Recherche en Sante de la Reproduction en Guinee (CERREGUI)
  • University of Ghana
  • Mother and Child Hospital
  • Burnet Institute
  • University of Medical Sciences
  • Adeoyo Maternity Teaching Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

386 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Women across the world are mistreated during childbirth. We aimed to develop and implement evidence-informed, validated tools to measure mistreatment during childbirth, and report results from a cross-sectional study in four low-income and middle-income countries. Methods: We prospectively recruited women aged at least 15 years in twelve health facilities (three per country) in Ghana, Guinea, Myanmar, and Nigeria between Sept 19, 2016, and Jan 18, 2018. Continuous observations of labour and childbirth were done from admission up to 2 h post partum. Surveys were administered by interviewers in the community to women up to 8 weeks post partum. Labour observations were not done in Myanmar. Data were collected on sociodemographics, obstetric history, and experiences of mistreatment. Findings: 2016 labour observations and 2672 surveys were done. 838 (41·6%) of 2016 observed women and 945 (35·4%) of 2672 surveyed women experienced physical or verbal abuse, or stigma or discrimination. Physical and verbal abuse peaked 30 min before birth until 15 min after birth (observation). Many women did not consent for episiotomy (observation: 190 [75·1%] of 253; survey: 295 [56·1%] of 526) or caesarean section (observation: 35 [13·4%] of 261; survey: 52 [10·8%] of 483), despite receiving these procedures. 133 (5·0%) of 2672 women or their babies were detained in the facility because they were unable to pay the bill (survey). Younger age (15–19 years) and lack of education were the primary determinants of mistreatment (survey). For example, younger women with no education (odds ratio [OR] 3·6, 95% CI 1·6–8·0) and younger women with some education (OR 1·6, 1·1–2·3) were more likely to experience verbal abuse, compared with older women (≥30 years), adjusting for marital status and parity. Interpretation: More than a third of women experienced mistreatment and were particularly vulnerable around the time of birth. Women who were younger and less educated were most at risk, suggesting inequalities in how women are treated during childbirth. Understanding drivers and structural dimensions of mistreatment, including gender and social inequalities, is essential to ensure that interventions adequately account for the broader context. Funding: United States Agency for International Development and the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1750-1763
Number of pages14
JournalThe Lancet
Volume394
Issue number10210
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Nov 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this