TY - JOUR
T1 - Health Policy and Systems Research Capacities in Ethiopia and Ghana
T2 - Findings from a Self-Assessment
AU - Tangcharoensathien, Viroj
AU - Sudhakar, Morankar
AU - Birhanu, Zewdie
AU - Abraham, Gelila
AU - Bawah, Ayaga
AU - Kyei, Pearl
AU - Biney, Adriana
AU - Shroff, Zubin Cyrus
AU - Witthayapipopsakul, Woranan
AU - Panichkriangkrai, Warisa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Tangcharoensathien et al.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Introduction: Health systems are complex. Policies targeted at health system development may be informed by health policy and systems research (HPSR). This study assesses HPSR capacity to generate evidence and inform policy in Ethiopia and Ghana. Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach including a self-administered survey at selected HPSR institutes and in-depth interviews of policy makers. Results: Both countries have limited capacity to generate HPSR evidence, especially in terms of mobilizing adequate funding and retaining a critical number of competent researchers who understand complex policy processes, have the skills to influence policy, and know policy makers’ demands for evidence. Common challenges are limited government research funding, rigidity in executing the research budget, and reliance on donor funding that might not respond to national health priorities. There are no large research programs in either country. The annual number of HPSR projects per research institute in Ethiopia (10 projects) was higher than in Ghana (2.5 projects), Ethiopia has a significantly smaller annual budget for health research. Policy makers in the 2 countries increasingly recognize the importance of evidence-informed policy making, but various challenges remain in building effective interactions with HPSR institutes. Conclusion: We propose 3 synergistic recommendations to strengthen HPSR capacity in Ethiopia and Ghana. First, strengthen researchers’ capacity and enhance their opportunities to know policy actors; engage with the policy community; and identify and work with policy entrepreneurs, who have attributes, skills, and strategies to achieve a successful policy. Second, deliver policy-relevant research findings in a timely way and embed research into key health programs to guide effective implementation. Third, mobilize local and international funding to strengthen HPSR capacities as well as address challenges with recruiting and retaining a critical number of talented researchers. These recommendations may be applied to other low- and middle-income countries to strengthen HPSR capacities.
AB - Introduction: Health systems are complex. Policies targeted at health system development may be informed by health policy and systems research (HPSR). This study assesses HPSR capacity to generate evidence and inform policy in Ethiopia and Ghana. Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach including a self-administered survey at selected HPSR institutes and in-depth interviews of policy makers. Results: Both countries have limited capacity to generate HPSR evidence, especially in terms of mobilizing adequate funding and retaining a critical number of competent researchers who understand complex policy processes, have the skills to influence policy, and know policy makers’ demands for evidence. Common challenges are limited government research funding, rigidity in executing the research budget, and reliance on donor funding that might not respond to national health priorities. There are no large research programs in either country. The annual number of HPSR projects per research institute in Ethiopia (10 projects) was higher than in Ghana (2.5 projects), Ethiopia has a significantly smaller annual budget for health research. Policy makers in the 2 countries increasingly recognize the importance of evidence-informed policy making, but various challenges remain in building effective interactions with HPSR institutes. Conclusion: We propose 3 synergistic recommendations to strengthen HPSR capacity in Ethiopia and Ghana. First, strengthen researchers’ capacity and enhance their opportunities to know policy actors; engage with the policy community; and identify and work with policy entrepreneurs, who have attributes, skills, and strategies to achieve a successful policy. Second, deliver policy-relevant research findings in a timely way and embed research into key health programs to guide effective implementation. Third, mobilize local and international funding to strengthen HPSR capacities as well as address challenges with recruiting and retaining a critical number of talented researchers. These recommendations may be applied to other low- and middle-income countries to strengthen HPSR capacities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137888094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00715
DO - 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00715
M3 - Article
C2 - 36109057
AN - SCOPUS:85137888094
SN - 2169-575X
VL - 10
JO - Global Health Science and Practice
JF - Global Health Science and Practice
M1 - e2100715
ER -