Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Governing the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator: towards greater participation, transparency, and accountability

  • Suerie Moon
  • , Jana Armstrong
  • , Brian Hutler
  • , Ross Upshur
  • , Rachel Katz
  • , Caesar Atuire
  • , Anant Bhan
  • , Ezekiel Emanuel
  • , Ruth Faden
  • , Prakash Ghimire
  • , Dirceu Greco
  • , Calvin WL Ho
  • , Sonali Kochhar
  • , G. Owen Schaefer
  • , Ehsan Shamsi-Gooshki
  • , Jerome Amir Singh
  • , Maxwell J. Smith
  • , Jonathan Wolff
  • Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies
  • Independent Global Health Consultant
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
  • Faculty of Health Sciences
  • Yenepoya University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Tribhuvan University
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • University of Washington
  • National University of Singapore
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal
  • Oxford University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-A) is a multistakeholder initiative quickly constructed in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic to respond to a catastrophic breakdown in global cooperation. ACT-A is now the largest international effort to achieve equitable access to COVID-19 health technologies, and its governance is a matter of broad public importance. We traced the evolution of ACT-A's governance through publicly available documents and analysed it against three principles embedded in the founding mission statement of ACT-A: participation, transparency, and accountability. We found three challenges to realising these principles. First, the roles of the various organisations in ACT-A decision making are unclear, obscuring who might be accountable to whom and for what. Second, the absence of a clearly defined decision making body; ACT-A instead has multiple centres of legally binding decision making and uneven arrangements for information transparency, inhibiting meaningful participation. Third, the nearly indiscernible role of governments in ACT-A, raising key questions about political legitimacy and channels for public accountability. With global public health and billions in public funding at stake, short-term improvements to governance arrangements can and should now be made. Efforts to strengthen pandemic preparedness for the future require attention to ethical, legitimate arrangements for governance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)487-494
Number of pages8
JournalThe Lancet
Volume399
Issue number10323
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jan 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Governing the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator: towards greater participation, transparency, and accountability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this