Abstract
This paper argues for global sharing of COVID-19 treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond based on principles of global solidarity. It starts by distinguishing two types of COVID-19 treatments and models sharing strategies for each in small-group scenarios, contrasting groups that are solidaristic with those composed of self-interest maximizers to show the appeal of solidaristic reasoning. It then extends the analysis, arguing that a similar logic should apply within and between nations. To further elaborate global solidarity, the paper distinguishes morally voluntary, sliding-scale, and mandatory versions. It argues for an all-hands-on-deck approach and gives examples to illustrate. The paper concludes that during the COVID-19 crisis, global solidarity is a core value, and global sharing of COVID-19 treatments should be considered a duty of justice, not of charity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 699-707 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Bioethics |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2022 |
Keywords
- COVID-19
- allocation
- ethics
- global health
- justice
- solidarity