Abstract
Ghana's Family Planning Program (FPP), maternal mortality intervention, and HIV/AIDS control program are all health policy priorities, which are supposed to be complementary to achieve desirable reproductive health outcomes. However, it appears disproportionately less attention is being paid to the former compared to the latter two, which are relatively new health policies. This may have implications not only for the effectiveness of the FPP and the other two policies, but more broadly reproductive health outcomes. This study investigates this claim and finds that the FPP has policy merits and that its relegation to the background has led to a very little incentive to space births, and a marginally positive incentive to increase fecund level, with attendant negative developmental consequences. It then concludes that despite the alarming rate of maternal mortality and loss of lives through HIV/AIDS, Ghana's population is still growing at a dangerous pace, making the FPP as relevant as ever.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 25-39 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Social Research and Policy |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Development
- Family planning program (FPP)
- Free medical care for pregnant women (FMCPW)
- Maternal health
- Optimum population size
- Policy synergy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ghana's family planning program: A neglected policy initiative?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver