Gender bias in households’ educational expenditures: Does the stage of schooling matter?

Gender gaps in educational outcomes still exist, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. This incidence could be attributed to an uneven allocation of household resources towards the schooling of boys and girls. Utilising the household level data from the latest wave of the Ghana Living Standards Survey, the paper sheds light on gender bias in households’ educational expenditures using a ‘Hurdle or Two-Part Model’ estimation strategy. The two-part model unpacks the key sources of gender bias in household's expenditure allocations. A number of interesting findings emerge: The study established a significant pro-male bias in both the enrollment decision and the conditional expenditure decision among the cohort of individuals in the post-secondary schooling age while only the former source of bias is present in the senior-secondary schooling age cohort. Strikingly, however, no gender bias is found in the positive expenditure decision for boys and girls belonging to the basic education school-going age cohort, even though a pro-male bias operates in the conditional educational expenditure decision for children in the primary school-going age group. Contrary to earlier findings, we find a pro-female bias in a household's decision of how much to spend conditional upon enrolling boys and girls for the cohort of children in the junior secondary schooling age. These findings have important implications for policy action.