TY - JOUR
T1 - Freedom, competition and bank efficiency in Sub-Saharan Africa
AU - Sarpong-Kumankoma, Emmanuel
AU - Abor, Joshua
AU - Aboagye, Anthony Q.Q.
AU - Amidu, Mohammed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Purpose – This study aims to consider the effect of financial (banking) freedom and competition on bank efficiency. Design/methodology/approach – With data from 11 Sub-Saharan African countries over the period 2006-2012, the study estimates both competition (market power) and bank cost efficiency using the same stochastic frontier framework. Subsequently, Tobit models, including instrumental variable Tobit regression, are used to assess how financial freedom affects the relationship between competition and bank efficiency. Findings – The results show that increase in market power (less competition) leads to greater bank cost efficiency, but the effect is weaker with higher levels of financial freedom. This is not consistent with the quiet life hypothesis. Practical implications – Policymakers usually take the view that opening up banking markets to greater competition may lead to higher efficiency. However, the results have shown that allowing banks to maintain some level of market power may be necessary to ensure banking system efficiency. Originality/value – This study deepens the understanding of the inconsistent relationship between competition and bank efficiency, by using the same framework to measure both competition and efficiency, and by providing new empirical evidence on how the level of financial freedom affects this relationship.
AB - Purpose – This study aims to consider the effect of financial (banking) freedom and competition on bank efficiency. Design/methodology/approach – With data from 11 Sub-Saharan African countries over the period 2006-2012, the study estimates both competition (market power) and bank cost efficiency using the same stochastic frontier framework. Subsequently, Tobit models, including instrumental variable Tobit regression, are used to assess how financial freedom affects the relationship between competition and bank efficiency. Findings – The results show that increase in market power (less competition) leads to greater bank cost efficiency, but the effect is weaker with higher levels of financial freedom. This is not consistent with the quiet life hypothesis. Practical implications – Policymakers usually take the view that opening up banking markets to greater competition may lead to higher efficiency. However, the results have shown that allowing banks to maintain some level of market power may be necessary to ensure banking system efficiency. Originality/value – This study deepens the understanding of the inconsistent relationship between competition and bank efficiency, by using the same framework to measure both competition and efficiency, and by providing new empirical evidence on how the level of financial freedom affects this relationship.
KW - Banks
KW - Competition
KW - Efficiency
KW - Financial freedom
KW - Lerner
KW - Market power
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055733497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/IJLMA-11-2016-0142
DO - 10.1108/IJLMA-11-2016-0142
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85055733497
SN - 1754-243X
VL - 59
SP - 1359
EP - 1380
JO - International Journal of Law and Management
JF - International Journal of Law and Management
IS - 6
ER -