Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Faecal Coliforms and Escherichia coli Contamination in Drinking Water Sources in Cholera Hotspot Areas of Lusaka District, Zambia: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Harriet Ng’ombe
  • , Charlie C. Luchen
  • , Bernard Phiri
  • , Dennis Ngosa
  • , Robby Kapikila
  • , Sydney Sakanya
  • , Chikondi Sakala
  • , Nyuma Mbewe
  • , Fraser Liswaniso
  • , Roma Chilengi
  • , Eduan Wilkinson
  • , Lenine Liebenberg
  • , Wesaal Khan
  • , Nicholas R. Thomson
  • , David Sack
  • , Samuel Bosomprah
  • , Caroline C. Chisenga
  • Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia
  • Stellenbosch University
  • Zambia National Public Health Institute
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The October 2023 to 2024 cholera outbreak demonstrates significant challenges related to water quality and sanitation, especially in peri-urban areas with limited access to clean water. This study assesses the presence of faecal coliforms and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in drinking water sources across five townships, identified as cholera transmission hotspots, two months post the cholera outbreak in the Lusaka District. A total of 169 water samples were collected from protected sources, treated piped water, and unprotected sources, including dams and shallow wells. Faecal coliforms and E. coli were detected across all source types. Among unprotected sources, 92.3% (12/13) of samples contained ≥100 CFU/100 mL of both faecal coliforms and E. coli. Protected sources showed variable contamination, with 18.3% exceeding ≥100 CFU/100 mL for faecal coliforms and 15.4% for E. coli. Treated water sources showed the lowest contamination, with 88.5% of samples having no detectable faecal coliforms and 90.4% having no detectable E. coli. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression showed that treated water sources were associated with substantially lower faecal coliform counts compared with protected sources (PR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03–0.35), while unprotected sources exhibited higher contamination intensity (PR = 1.77, 95% CI: 0.94–3.31). Treated sources were significantly more likely to be structurally free of contamination, whereas unprotected sources had an extremely low probability of yielding zero counts. These findings indicate that current water safety conditions in Lusaka’s cholera hotspot areas remain inadequate for preventing faecal-oral transmission.

Original languageEnglish
Article number420
JournalMicroorganisms
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation

Keywords

  • Escherichia coli
  • drinking water
  • faecal coliform
  • risks
  • waterborne disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Faecal Coliforms and Escherichia coli Contamination in Drinking Water Sources in Cholera Hotspot Areas of Lusaka District, Zambia: A Cross-Sectional Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this