Factors associated with pregnancy uptake decisions among seropositive HIV people receiving antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review

Abdul Razak Doat, Roberta Mensima Amoah, Kennedy Diema Konlan, Kennedy Dodam Konlan, Juliana Asibi Abdulai, Margaret W. Kukeba, Iddrisu Mohammed, Joel Afram Saah

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: This study determined the factors associated with pregnancy uptake decision among seropositive HIV people receiving antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa. Design: Systematic review. Methods: The population, intervention, comparison and outcomes framework was adopted to search for literature after a scoping review using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines adopted in searching, and screening articles from four databases (PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and Google scholar) to find 12 articles suitable for this study. Results: Motivators of pregnancy uptake among HIV-positive women include desire to have children, knowledge about PMTCT, cultural duty for married women to have children, and household income. Demotivating factors included the modern method of contraception and burden associated with pregnancy. Conclusion: There is a need to improve on services that reduce conception-related risks especially for women who choose to conceive and to incorporate fertility-related counselling into HIV treatment services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2239-2249
Number of pages11
JournalNursing Open
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2022

Keywords

  • AIDS treatment
  • Ghana
  • HIV and AIDS
  • HIV therapy
  • antiretroviral therapy
  • childbearing
  • childbearing age
  • reproductive age
  • sub-Saharan Africa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors associated with pregnancy uptake decisions among seropositive HIV people receiving antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this