TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence based QUality Improvement for Prescribing Stewardship in ICU (EQUIPS-ICU)
T2 - protocol for type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study
AU - Wagstaff, Duncan
AU - Amausi, John
AU - Arfin, Sumaiya
AU - Aryal, Diptesh
AU - Nor, Mohd Basri Mat
AU - Bonney, Joseph
AU - Dondorp, Arjen
AU - Dongelmans, David
AU - Dullawe, Layoni
AU - Fazla, Fathima
AU - Ghose, Aniruddha
AU - Hanciles, Eva
AU - Haniffa, Rashan
AU - Hashmi, Madiha
AU - Smith, Adam Hewitt
AU - Kumar, Bharath
AU - Minh, Yen Lam
AU - Moonesinghe, Ramani
AU - Pisani, Luigi
AU - Sendagire, Cornelius
AU - Hasan, Mohd Shahnaz
AU - Ghalib, Maryam Shamal
AU - Frimpong, Moses Siaw
AU - Ranzani, Otavio
AU - Sultan, Menbeu
AU - Thomson, David
AU - Tripathy, Swagata
AU - Thwaites, Louise
AU - Uddin, Rabiul Alam Md Erfan
AU - Mazlan, Mohd Zulfakar
AU - Waweru-Siika, Wangari
AU - Beane, Abigail
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background: Approximately half of all antimicrobial prescriptions in intensive care units (ICUs) may be inappropriate, including those prescribed when not needed, in unnecessary combinations or for longer durations than needed. Inappropriate prescribing is costly, exposes patients to unnecessary side-effects and drives population-level antimicrobial resistance, the prevalence and consequences of which are greatest in low- and middle-income countries. However, the implementation of interventions to improve the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing has been variable and requires further study. Methods: We propose a type III hybrid implementation/effectiveness interventional cohort trial in 35 ICUs in up to 11 low- and middle- income countries. The study intervention is a structured review of antimicrobial prescriptions as recommended by the World Health Organisation. Strategies to support stakeholder-led implementation include development of local protocols, registry-enabled audit and feedback, and education. Evaluation of implementation, and the determinants of its success, is informed by the RE-AIM framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research respectively. The primary outcome is a composite measure of fidelity, reach and adoption. Secondary outcomes describe the effectiveness of the intervention on improving antimicrobial prescribing. Qualitative interviews will assess relevant implementation acceptability, adaptations and maintenance. A baseline survey will investigate ICU-level antimicrobial stewardship structures and processes. Discussion: This study addresses global policy priorities by supporting implementation research of antimicrobial stewardship, and strengthening associated healthcare professional competencies. It does this in a setting where improvement is sorely needed: low- and middle- income country ICUs. The study will also describe the influence of pre-existing antimicrobial stewardship structures and processes on implementation and improve understanding about the efficacy of strategies to overcome barriers to implementation in these settings. Trial registration: This study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ref NCT06666738) on 31 Oct 2004. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06666738?term=NCT06666738&rank=1.
AB - Background: Approximately half of all antimicrobial prescriptions in intensive care units (ICUs) may be inappropriate, including those prescribed when not needed, in unnecessary combinations or for longer durations than needed. Inappropriate prescribing is costly, exposes patients to unnecessary side-effects and drives population-level antimicrobial resistance, the prevalence and consequences of which are greatest in low- and middle-income countries. However, the implementation of interventions to improve the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing has been variable and requires further study. Methods: We propose a type III hybrid implementation/effectiveness interventional cohort trial in 35 ICUs in up to 11 low- and middle- income countries. The study intervention is a structured review of antimicrobial prescriptions as recommended by the World Health Organisation. Strategies to support stakeholder-led implementation include development of local protocols, registry-enabled audit and feedback, and education. Evaluation of implementation, and the determinants of its success, is informed by the RE-AIM framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research respectively. The primary outcome is a composite measure of fidelity, reach and adoption. Secondary outcomes describe the effectiveness of the intervention on improving antimicrobial prescribing. Qualitative interviews will assess relevant implementation acceptability, adaptations and maintenance. A baseline survey will investigate ICU-level antimicrobial stewardship structures and processes. Discussion: This study addresses global policy priorities by supporting implementation research of antimicrobial stewardship, and strengthening associated healthcare professional competencies. It does this in a setting where improvement is sorely needed: low- and middle- income country ICUs. The study will also describe the influence of pre-existing antimicrobial stewardship structures and processes on implementation and improve understanding about the efficacy of strategies to overcome barriers to implementation in these settings. Trial registration: This study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ref NCT06666738) on 31 Oct 2004. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06666738?term=NCT06666738&rank=1.
KW - Antimicrobial Resistance
KW - Antimicrobial Stewardship
KW - Audit & Feedback
KW - Critical Care
KW - Implementation
KW - Intensive Care
KW - Low- and Middle- Income Countries
KW - Quality Improvement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219608666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13012-024-01413-4
DO - 10.1186/s13012-024-01413-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85219608666
SN - 1748-5908
VL - 20
JO - Implementation Science
JF - Implementation Science
IS - 1
M1 - 12
ER -