TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethics surrounding artificial intelligence-powered assistive technologies used by people with visual and hearing impairments
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Sasu, Joseph Kwame
AU - Ogunyemi, Abiodun Afolayan
AU - Quaicoe, James Sunney
AU - Bauters, Merja
AU - Aheto, Simon Peter Kafui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This paper explores the integration of artificial intelligence into assistive technologies (AI-ATs) for individuals with visual and hearing impairments. While these technologies enhance independence and quality of life, they raise complex ethical challenges demanding systematic examination. We conducted a systematic review synthesising findings from 81 peer-reviewed publications (2010–2024), searching nine databases with rigorous inclusion criteria. An analytical framework examined 11 ethical dimensions across various implementation contexts. The analysis reveals equity and accessibility as primary ethical concerns, followed by autonomy and privacy protection. Workplace applications dominate the literature, while educational contexts remain underrepresented. Implementation strategies prioritise user-centred design but show limited attention to technical accountability. Findings indicate critical misalignment between ethical principles and practical implementation. This review contributes a comprehensive framework for evaluating AI-AT ethics and highlights the need for integrated development approaches emphasising interdisciplinary collaboration among technologists, ethicists and end-users.
AB - This paper explores the integration of artificial intelligence into assistive technologies (AI-ATs) for individuals with visual and hearing impairments. While these technologies enhance independence and quality of life, they raise complex ethical challenges demanding systematic examination. We conducted a systematic review synthesising findings from 81 peer-reviewed publications (2010–2024), searching nine databases with rigorous inclusion criteria. An analytical framework examined 11 ethical dimensions across various implementation contexts. The analysis reveals equity and accessibility as primary ethical concerns, followed by autonomy and privacy protection. Workplace applications dominate the literature, while educational contexts remain underrepresented. Implementation strategies prioritise user-centred design but show limited attention to technical accountability. Findings indicate critical misalignment between ethical principles and practical implementation. This review contributes a comprehensive framework for evaluating AI-AT ethics and highlights the need for integrated development approaches emphasising interdisciplinary collaboration among technologists, ethicists and end-users.
KW - Artificial intelligence-powered assistive technologies
KW - ethical considerations
KW - ethics
KW - hearing impairment
KW - implementation strategies
KW - visual impairment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020723525
U2 - 10.1080/17483107.2025.2570886
DO - 10.1080/17483107.2025.2570886
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105020723525
SN - 1748-3107
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
ER -