Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Essential Emergency and Critical Care: A consensus among global clinical experts

  • The EECC Collaborators
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Uppsala University
  • Nyköping Hospital
  • Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
  • Ifakara Health Institute
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
  • Wellcome Trust Research Laboratories Nairobi
  • University of Nairobi
  • The George Institute for Global Health
  • BARC Hospital
  • Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elders and Children, Tanzania
  • University of Toronto
  • Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme
  • Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Malawi
  • Kamuzu University of Health Sciences
  • University of Cape Town
  • The Red Cross University College

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Globally, critical illness results in millions of deaths every year. Although many of these deaths are potentially preventable, the basic, life-saving care of critically ill patients are often overlooked in health systems. Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC) has been devised as the care that should be provided to all critically ill patients in all hospitals in the world. EECC includes the effective care of low cost and low complexity for the identification and treatment of critically ill patients across all medical specialties. This study aimed to specify the content of EECC and additionally, given the surge of critical illness in the ongoing pandemic, the essential diagnosis-specific care for critically ill patients with COVID-19. Methods In a Delphi process, consensus (>90% agreement) was sought from a diverse panel of global clinical experts. The panel iteratively rated proposed treatments and actions based on previous guidelines and the WHO/ICRC's Basic Emergency Care. The output from the Delphi was adapted iteratively with specialist reviewers into a coherent and feasible package of clinical processes plus a list of hospital readiness requirements. Results The 269 experts in the Delphi panel had clinical experience in different acute medical specialties from 59 countries and from all resource settings. The agreed EECC package contains 40 clinical processes and 67 requirements, plus additions specific for COVID-19. Conclusion The study has specified the content of care that should be provided to all critically ill patients. Implementing EECC could be an effective strategy for policy makers to reduce preventable deaths worldwide.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere006585
JournalBMJ Global Health
Volume6
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Sep 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • health policy
  • health services research
  • health systems
  • surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Essential Emergency and Critical Care: A consensus among global clinical experts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this