Does psychological empowerment improve renewable energy technology acceptance and recommendation? Evidence from 17 rural communities

Divine Q. Agozie, Anthony Afful-Dadzie, Bright Akwasi Gyamfi, Festus Victor Bekun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research investigates the incorporation of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the Empowerment Theory into a robust construct within a Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM). Utilizing a cross-sectional survey approach, the study focuses on selected rural communities of Northern Ghana. The research encompasses 613 respondents, with an initial pilot study involving 80 participants. The study yields notable findings, establishing statistically significant and positive correlations between empowerment and attitude within the rural Ghanaian context. Furthermore, it identifies a significant influence of purchase intention on the propensity to recommend renewable energy technologies among rural households. These outcomes align with the principles of the Empowerment Theory and are in congruence with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDGs), particularly SDG-7 (universal access to energy) and SDG-12 (responsible production and consumption). The study's implications extend to policy recommendations, specifically tailored to the unique energy landscape of Ghana. These findings contribute to a deeper comprehension of renewable energy proliferation dynamics and emphasize their crucial role in advancing sustainable development objectives and fostering responsible energy practices.

Original languageEnglish
Article number119449
JournalRenewable Energy
Volume219
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Clean energy target
  • Clean technologies
  • Rural Ghana
  • SDG's
  • UTAUT theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does psychological empowerment improve renewable energy technology acceptance and recommendation? Evidence from 17 rural communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this