Dealing with Ghana's winner-takes-all politics: A case for proportional representation?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is the first in a series of publications aimed at provoking thought and discourse on issues relating to "Winner-Takes-All" politics in Ghana. It discusses winner-takes-all as an electoral formula and situates it within the context of winner-takes-all politics in Ghana. It highlights the dangers of Ghana's winner-takes-all politics such as the marginalization of perceived political opponents and the feeling of exclusion from the governance process by those who do not belong to the government/ruling party. The paper argues further that winner-takes-all politics undermines the quest for national development, cohesion and the drive towards democratic maturity. In proffering policy recommendation, the paper critically examines Proportional Representation as one possible mechanism for ensuring inclusive governance and dealing with some of the challenges associated with winner-takes-all politics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-46
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Social Sciences Research
Volume1
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2015

Keywords

  • Development
  • Elections
  • National cohesion
  • Opposition parties
  • Politics of exclusion
  • Proportional representation
  • Winner-takes-all

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dealing with Ghana's winner-takes-all politics: A case for proportional representation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this