Cross mating studies among five fruit fly parasitoid populations: Potential biological control implications for tephritid pests

Maxwell K. Billah, Susan W. Kimani-Njogu, Robert A. Wharton, William A. Overholt, David D. Wilson, Millicent A. Cobblah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reproductive compatibility between four different species/populations of the tephritid parasitoid Psyttalia (Walker) species from Kenya and individuals of the morphologically identical Psyttalia concolor (Szépligeti) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from a laboratory culture in Italy used in augmentative biological control of olive fly, Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin) (Diptera: Tephritidae) was assessed through cross mating tests using single-pair and group mating methods. Reciprocal crosses among the species resulted in the production of viable offsprings up to the second generation. In spite of the successful production of viable offspring in the laboratory, Psyttalia species are known to have specific host fruit and/or host fly preferences and populations/species may be isolated in one way or the other. However, it is not known whether these populations/species interbreed in the field. We discuss the ability of these parasitoids to interbreed and the potential effects of that on their use as biological control agents, especially in environments where other closely related species are present or in situations where multiple parasitoid introductions are intended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)709-724
Number of pages16
JournalBioControl
Volume53
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008

Keywords

  • Augmentative
  • Biological control
  • Cross mating
  • Parasitoids
  • Psyttalia concolor
  • Reproductive compatibility
  • Tephritids
  • Viable offspring

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross mating studies among five fruit fly parasitoid populations: Potential biological control implications for tephritid pests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this