TY - JOUR
T1 - Contraceptive and sexual health services during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery
T2 - a mixed-methods study in England
AU - The WHO HRP Social Science Research Team
AU - Sawyer, Alexandra
AU - Aicken, Catherine
AU - Huber, Jörg W.
AU - Vera, Jaime
AU - Williams, Deborah
AU - Ali, Moazzam
AU - Garcia-Camacho, Gabriela
AU - Seuc, Armando Humberto
AU - Sherriff, Nigel
AU - Camacho, Gabriela Garcia
AU - Seuc, Armando
AU - Abrego, Hugo Gamerro
AU - Chebet, Joy Jerop
AU - Thorson, Anna
AU - Thwin, Soe Soe
AU - Toskin, Igor
AU - Kapustianyk, Grace
AU - Kuganantham, Hamsadvani
AU - Brizuela, Vanessa
AU - Kim, Caron
AU - Huber, Jörg W.
AU - Sawyer, Alexandra
AU - Poli, Ranieri
AU - Uccella, Stefano
AU - Garzon, Simone
AU - Savoldi, Alessia
AU - Cordioli, Maddalena
AU - Mirandola, Massimo
AU - Mohiddin, Abdu
AU - Okwaro, Ferdinand
AU - Temmerman, Marleen
AU - Rungreangkulkij, Somporn
AU - Jampathong, Nampet
AU - Sothornwit, Jen
AU - Lumbiganon, Pisake
AU - Somani, Salima
AU - Parpio, Yasmin
AU - Baig, Marina
AU - Lakhani, Arusa
AU - Ladak, Laila
AU - Karmaliani, Rozina
AU - Maya, Ernest T.
AU - Manu, Adom
AU - Modey, Emefa Judith
AU - Torpey, Kwasi
AU - Ogum Alangea, Deda
AU - Wang, Hao
AU - Xie, Xizhuo
AU - Peng, Chunxiao
AU - Yang, Ge
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background: Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is essential for public health. COVID-19 led to major disruptions in the provision of essential services including SRH services. Within the context of a multi-country project, this study aimed to explore individual and service-level impacts on contraceptive and sexual health services during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery phase in England. Methods: A longitudinal, mixed-methods design was implemented, collecting data in two phases, approximately 9 months apart (November 2021 and July 2022). The study comprised in-depth interviews with staff (n = 4) and clients (n = 20) of a sexual health and contraceptive clinical service in the Southeast of England. Over the same timeframe, a quantitative service availability and readiness assessment (SARA) was completed, based on World Health Organization validated tools. Results: Sexual health and contraceptive services continued to operate throughout the pandemic, however measures taken to prevent COVID-19 transmission and staff capacity issues (due to staff redeployment, staff sickness) impacted on patient choice (e.g. how the service could be accessed, methods of contraception available) and patient experience (e.g. delays in accessing healthcare). Despite disruptions, staff described how in-person provision remained available almost continuously for urgent/vulnerable cases. SARA data confirmed service availability, and qualitative data indicate how this was managed. For example, postal home self-sampling for STIs/HIV was expanded and contraceptive counselling by telephone was introduced to reduce clinic visits, and was retained due to popularity. At Time 2, services were running close to normal. Conclusions: COVID-19 disrupted sexual health and contraceptive services in England. Compared to pre-pandemic, more elements of these services were delivered remotely. Readiness to adapt was aided by the pre-pandemic direction-of-travel towards greater use of digital and telemedicine services. Innovations require robust evaluation to ensure optimisation for public health benefit both in the pandemic and post-pandemic context.
AB - Background: Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is essential for public health. COVID-19 led to major disruptions in the provision of essential services including SRH services. Within the context of a multi-country project, this study aimed to explore individual and service-level impacts on contraceptive and sexual health services during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery phase in England. Methods: A longitudinal, mixed-methods design was implemented, collecting data in two phases, approximately 9 months apart (November 2021 and July 2022). The study comprised in-depth interviews with staff (n = 4) and clients (n = 20) of a sexual health and contraceptive clinical service in the Southeast of England. Over the same timeframe, a quantitative service availability and readiness assessment (SARA) was completed, based on World Health Organization validated tools. Results: Sexual health and contraceptive services continued to operate throughout the pandemic, however measures taken to prevent COVID-19 transmission and staff capacity issues (due to staff redeployment, staff sickness) impacted on patient choice (e.g. how the service could be accessed, methods of contraception available) and patient experience (e.g. delays in accessing healthcare). Despite disruptions, staff described how in-person provision remained available almost continuously for urgent/vulnerable cases. SARA data confirmed service availability, and qualitative data indicate how this was managed. For example, postal home self-sampling for STIs/HIV was expanded and contraceptive counselling by telephone was introduced to reduce clinic visits, and was retained due to popularity. At Time 2, services were running close to normal. Conclusions: COVID-19 disrupted sexual health and contraceptive services in England. Compared to pre-pandemic, more elements of these services were delivered remotely. Readiness to adapt was aided by the pre-pandemic direction-of-travel towards greater use of digital and telemedicine services. Innovations require robust evaluation to ensure optimisation for public health benefit both in the pandemic and post-pandemic context.
KW - Access to care
KW - COVID-19
KW - Contraception
KW - HIV testing
KW - Health systems
KW - Mixed-methods
KW - Pandemic preparedness
KW - STI
KW - Sexual health
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028998914
U2 - 10.1186/s12978-025-02184-x
DO - 10.1186/s12978-025-02184-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 41612449
AN - SCOPUS:105028998914
SN - 1742-4755
VL - 22
JO - Reproductive Health
JF - Reproductive Health
IS - Suppl 3
M1 - 276
ER -