TY - JOUR
T1 - Bridging ethics and culture
T2 - a co-created, culturally sensitive informed consent framework for research in Bimoba and Mamprusi communities in Ghana
AU - Appiah, Richard
AU - Weobong, Benedict
AU - Raviola, Giuseppe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Informed consent (IC) is a cornerstone of ethical research, yet standard models grounded in Western, individual-focused principles often require contextual adaptation in collectivist settings. This study co-created a culturally responsive IC framework for research with the Bimoba and Mamprusi ethnic groups in Ghana, operationalizing respect for autonomy in ways that reflect local values and decision-making norms. We employed a qualitative, cross-sectional design involving interviews and focus group discussions with community leaders, members, and stakeholders from academia, NGOs, and ethics committees. Thematic analysis identified culturally endorsed recruitment practices, resulting in a four-step framework: community entry, independent mediation at households, invitation of eligible participants, and a culturally embedded, multi-step consent process. The framework was pilot-tested in four communities and developed through a collaborative, multistakeholder process. While grounded in IC principles, the framework reflects broader community engagement values, reinforcing relational autonomy, trust, and cultural legitimacy. Rather than rejecting standard models, it offers a context-sensitive adaptation that enables ethical and legitimate recruitment. This study informs research ethics in the Global South and offers practical guidance for researchers, ethics committees, and institutions in similar contexts.
AB - Informed consent (IC) is a cornerstone of ethical research, yet standard models grounded in Western, individual-focused principles often require contextual adaptation in collectivist settings. This study co-created a culturally responsive IC framework for research with the Bimoba and Mamprusi ethnic groups in Ghana, operationalizing respect for autonomy in ways that reflect local values and decision-making norms. We employed a qualitative, cross-sectional design involving interviews and focus group discussions with community leaders, members, and stakeholders from academia, NGOs, and ethics committees. Thematic analysis identified culturally endorsed recruitment practices, resulting in a four-step framework: community entry, independent mediation at households, invitation of eligible participants, and a culturally embedded, multi-step consent process. The framework was pilot-tested in four communities and developed through a collaborative, multistakeholder process. While grounded in IC principles, the framework reflects broader community engagement values, reinforcing relational autonomy, trust, and cultural legitimacy. Rather than rejecting standard models, it offers a context-sensitive adaptation that enables ethical and legitimate recruitment. This study informs research ethics in the Global South and offers practical guidance for researchers, ethics committees, and institutions in similar contexts.
KW - Ghanaian ethnic groups
KW - Informed consent
KW - collectivist norms
KW - community-based participatory research
KW - cultural sensitivity
KW - research ethics
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007473701
U2 - 10.1080/10508422.2025.2512069
DO - 10.1080/10508422.2025.2512069
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105007473701
SN - 1050-8422
JO - Ethics and Behavior
JF - Ethics and Behavior
ER -