Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Antimicrobial Resistance: Is Health Technology Assessment Part of the Solution or Part of the Problem?

  • Abigail R. Colson
  • , Alec Morton
  • , Christine Årdal
  • , Kalipso Chalkidou
  • , Sally C. Davies
  • , Louis P. Garrison
  • , Mark Jit
  • , Ramanan Laxminarayan
  • , Itamar Megiddo
  • , Chantal Morel
  • , Justice Nonvignon
  • , Kevin Outterson
  • , John H. Rex
  • , Abdur Razzaque Sarker
  • , Mark Sculpher
  • , Beth Woods
  • , Yue Xiao
  • Strathclyde Business School, United Kingdom
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • Imperial College London
  • UK Department of Health and Social Care
  • University of Washington
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
  • Economics & Policy
  • University Clinics Bonn
  • Uppsala University
  • Geneva University
  • University of Ghana
  • Boston University
  • F2G Limited
  • Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies
  • University of York
  • China National Health Development Research Centre (National Centre for Medicine and Health Technology Assessment)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a serious challenge to the success and sustainability of our healthcare systems. There has been increasing policy attention given to antimicrobial resistance in the last few years, and increased amounts of funding have been channeled into funding for research and development of antimicrobial agents. Nevertheless, manufacturers doubt whether there will be a market for new antimicrobial technologies sufficient to enable them to recoup their investment. Health technology assessment (HTA) has a critical role in creating confidence that if valuable technologies can be developed they will be reimbursed at a level that captures their true value. We identify 3 deficiencies of current HTA processes for appraising antimicrobial agents: a methods-centric approach rather than problem-centric approach for dealing with new challenges, a lack of tools for thinking about changing patterns of infection, and the absence of an approach to epidemiological risks. We argue that, to play their role more effectively, HTA agencies need to broaden their methodological tool kit, design and communicate their analysis to a wider set of users, and incorporate long-term policy goals, such as containing resistance, as part of their evaluation criteria alongside immediate health gains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1828-1834
Number of pages7
JournalValue in Health
Volume24
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • antibiotic agents
  • antimicrobial resistance
  • economic evaluation
  • health technology assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antimicrobial Resistance: Is Health Technology Assessment Part of the Solution or Part of the Problem?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this