Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Wound Infection Isolates: High Resistance to Cephalosporins and Penicillin Among Ghanaian Patients in a Cross-Sectional Study

  • Nelson Kwashie
  • , Samuel Antwi-Baffour
  • , Lawrence Annison
  • , Lydia Ofosua Appah
  • , Uwakmfon Paul
  • , Solomon Akpobi
  • , Ebenezer Senu
  • Narh-Bita College
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
  • Elite Research and Data Science Institute
  • University of Texas at Dallas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Aim: Antibiotics remain among the most frequently prescribed medications in clinical practice. However, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an inevitable and irreversible consequence of bacterial adaptation to antimicrobial exposure. Despite its clinical importance, data on antibiotic resistance patterns of bacteria from wound infections in Ghana are limited. This study evaluated the prevalence and magnitude of antibiotic resistance among bacterial isolates from infected wounds in a Ghanaian population. Methods: This experimental cross-sectional study enrolled 300 patients with suspected wound infections receiving care at MDS-Lancet Laboratories. Wound swabs were collected, cultured on standard media, and incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h, with a second overnight reading. Bacterial identification was based on colony morphology, Gram staining, biochemical testing, and API 20 E/NE. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the disc diffusion method. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS v26.0 and GraphPad v9.5. Results: The predominant isolates were Escherichia coli (23.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.8%), Klebsiella spp. (19.2%), and Staphylococcus aureus (15.2%). Gram-negative isolates were most susceptible to aminoglycosides (Amikacin, Gentamicin), carbapenems (Ertapenem, Imipenem, Meropenem), and Tigecycline, whilst showing high resistance to 2nd, 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins (Cefuroxime, Ceftriaxone, and Cefepime, respectively) and Amoxicillin. Gram-positive isolates, including S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, were most susceptible to Gentamicin, Clindamycin, and Erythromycin, but resistant to 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins (Cefazolin and Cefoxitin respectively), penicillins (Augmentin and Cloxacillin), and Tetracycline. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers accounted for 30.3% of isolates, predominantly E. coli (50%) and Klebsiella spp. (43.9%). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCNS) were observed in 34.7% and 66.7% of isolates, respectively. Conclusion: Aminoglycosides and Linezolid are most effective against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria causing wound infections. However, both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria are resistant to 2nd generation cephalosporins and penicillin. High resistance to cephalosporins and penicillin calls for the necessity of culture-guided therapy for effective wound infection management.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere72176
JournalHealth Science Reports
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Keywords

  • Escherichia coli
  • Klebsiella spp.
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • aminoglycosides
  • antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
  • cephalosporins
  • linezolid
  • penicillin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Wound Infection Isolates: High Resistance to Cephalosporins and Penicillin Among Ghanaian Patients in a Cross-Sectional Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this